chinu
chinu
Both the examples are same.1. Leaves fall from the tree to land on the ground in Autumn.
2. Sometimes. Sometimes they hang there on the tree gathering snow.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Both the examples are same.1. Leaves fall from the tree to land on the ground in Autumn.
2. Sometimes. Sometimes they hang there on the tree gathering snow.
Yes. Am I certain that leaves fall in the Autumn?Both the examples are same.
Its ONLY the thing you look at.That's one way to look at it.
You assumptions are sloppy. I have gave up the search for them when I no longer owned anything that they would open.
Sorry. I don't understand your 'On the other hand...' sentence. Am I supposed to be disagreeing with it?
No. Burden of proof is on the claimant. If it were not, you would be forced to accept every single contradictory claim that you do not have the time to personally investigate as true.
There is no rational reason to start on the basis that any theistic claim falls under the category of "truth". They are just noise until some one can demonstrate one.
No. As of yet, all theists have pointed at are their personal desires and fears. Nothing extant. This has given us some honestly great stories and literary tropes and archetypes. Not to mention insight into the psyches of individuals and cultures. But nothing beyond the physical world.
Sorry, but that isn't my line of reasoning, or the reason that I eschew your religious beliefs. My non-agreement doesnt mean bupkis about what actually exists. There could be a god. But it doesn't matter until that can be demonstrated.
Even if there is, in reality, a god, neither you, nor the adherents of any other religion I have encountered, knows jack-all about it.
Atheists need, actually.
They will NOT unless given scientific proof.
Who's forcing ?They do need to, but they don't have to
That is not a response to what I said. You might want to throttle back on the purely emotional knee-jerk and actually read the words that were said. For content.your quote:No. Burden of proof is on the claimant. If it were not, you would be forced to accept every single contradictory claim that you do not have the time to personally investigate as true.
My Answer:Who is forcing anyone??? Has religion corrupted your thinking that everything should be rejected or accepted and that all the work of discovery should be by the one making the statement??
Nope. I have done sufficient research (probably far more than any five religious people you know) to satisfy myself that the god claims of the major religions, and several of the minor ones, have no rational foundation. But even had I not done so, the burden of proof for your claims would still have been all upon you. Your beliefs are not assumed to be true until someone disproves them. Have some humility, Bird.your quote:There could be a god. But it doesn't matter until that can be demonstrated.
My Answer:Are you waiting for others to demonstrate all the knowledge you acquire in this world??
I don't say this often, but that is just stupid. The world is full of things that I don't like. Things that I find profoundly disagreable. All things that rank far, far higher in importance and relevance than whether or not gods exist. If I shaped my beliefs to (as you put it) the agreeable view I really want to exist, then I would not believe those things either. You may shape your beliefs to an agreeable view. I don't.As I said before, I see little difference between atheists and theists. Seems, they both value Beliefs above all else, thereby shaping those beliefs to the agreeable view they really want to exist.
What you want or don't want is completely up to you. I am simply commenting on the erroneous content of your posts.Do you mistake me for a person wanting you to believe in God? Believing has never ever been important to God. It doesn't matter to me either. I simply place Truth in the world. What anyone else does with Truth is entirely up to them. They all have my blessings.
The research only showed the correlation with regular attendance of religious community. So I can't say if being a theist outside a community has the same benefits or not. Also, the attendance is statistically significant, meaning that it doesn't work with every single person, but with a significant number of people, a number that is enough to say that there is a strong correlation.Healthier, happier & live longer is NOT the case for ALL theists. Some do, and at the same time others don't. All it depends on one's own past deeds. True theist accepts the result of both good and bad deeds without any question. Whereas, buffer against depression and anxiety is just the by product of accepting the result of deed's without any question, NOT benefit.
Loll.. the one who is enjoying real God's company, does NOT require any human community.The research only showed the correlation with regular attendance of religious community. So I can't say if being a theist outside a community has the same benefits or not.
Also, the attendance is statistically significant, meaning that it doesn't work with every single person, but with a significant number of people, a number that is enough to say that there is a strong correlation.
That is not a response to what I said. You might want to throttle back on the purely emotional knee-jerk and actually read the words that were said. For content.
Nope. I have done sufficient research (probably far more than any five religious people you know) to satisfy myself that the god claims of the major religions, and several of the minor ones, have no rational foundation. But even had I not done so, the burden of proof for your claims would still have been all upon you. Your beliefs are not assumed to be true until someone disproves them. Have some humility, Bird.
I don't say this often, but that is just stupid. The world is full of things that I don't like. Things that I find profoundly disagreable. All things that rank far, far higher in importance and relevance than whether or not gods exist. If I shaped my beliefs to (as you put it) the agreeable view I really want to exist, then I would not believe those things either. You may shape your beliefs to an agreeable view. I don't.
And I will point out that when I stopped believing in God, that God was still my agreeable view. Ya goof.
What you want or don't want is completely up to you. I am simply commenting on the erroneous content of your posts.
First. I am sorry, but your god is not comparable to my keys. I have both tangible, practical, testable and directly demonstrable evidences that my keys actually existed. You have no such thing for your god.your quote:Nope. I have done sufficient research (probably far more than any five religious people you know) to satisfy myself that the god claims of the major religions, and several of the minor ones, have no rational foundation.
My Answer: You didn't find your keys either, did you?? If no religion really understands God and you base everything on religion, how are you to Discover anything about God at all? Where would you search for God? How would you understand God and what God is all about?? Where is that wide view? Where is that Intellect working?? Where are your answers? If it's hard, do you give up on the search??
I know you don't. You do not even seem to have a grasp on what my objections to your claims are. Either that or you do understand them, and simply refuse to address them. Either way, same result.your quote:I am simply commenting on the erroneous content of your posts.
My Answer: I have yet to see how they are erroneous. With whom is the view lacking? Conclusions made through a narrow or limited view usually results in a bad call.
My answer is: No profit/benefit.
Hence, nobody believe something that cannot be proven to be true.
Actually, this is a very good question that often arise in the mind of an atheists. A very good question because.. Often, atheists get lost into thinkings finding answer to this question.
I really like this question because there's certainly something to be gained by NOT believing in claims until any evidence supports that belief.
BUT, what's the purpose behind believing in something that cannot be proven to be true? People unnecessarily dishonor theists.
Actually, theist says that "God" suggest him/her how to answer the question of an atheist.The profit/benefit is when many great minds try to disprove it, and can't.
Actually, theist says that "God" suggest him/her how to answer the question of an atheist.
God's mind is the greatest mind. Nobody can defeat "Him" in a debate.
Hence, the defeat of an atheist is for sure without any doubts.
Actually its NOT me, It's the theist who suggested me how to answer you this question. And, perhaps "God" may have suggested that theist how to answer this question.You're way too deep man. Out.
Have heard that it always happens in the starting. But, settle down later on.To me belief seems pointless, and a little neurotic.
Have heard this too.Acknowledging possibilities feels more worthwhile
You may have described temperate regions but not the tropical regions.Yes. Am I certain that leaves fall in the Autumn?
Perhaps I am missing something in the arguments.
I don't, but why do you write such ambiguous things as if someone has proved the existence of God. Not all atheist are like that.The first thing God pointed out to me is that mankind carries such a Narrow view. I cry that!!
As I said before, I see little difference between atheists and theists.
Still, choosing what one wants to Discover is a big part of God's system.
Do you mistake me for a person wanting you to believe in God?
First. I am sorry, but your god is not comparable to my keys. I have both tangible, practical, testable and directly demonstrable evidences that my keys actually existed. You have no such thing for your god.
Second, your assumption that I "base everything on religion" is one that you made up out of whole close. It is a false assumption.
Third, your series of question are your problem. Not mine. You are the one who claims that there is a god. It is the fact that you cannot demonstrate that you have answers to any of those questions that I do not believe you.
I know you don't. You do not even seem to have a grasp on what my objections to your claims are. Either that or you do understand them, and simply refuse to address them. Either way, same result.