• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is Western Culture?

Kirran

Premium Member
In a large and diverse country such as the US, there's quite a variety of cultural types: if you look at music tastes, for example, there's at least two subcultures that listen to Country--they share some traits, but it isn't universal. Popular music gets listened to by much of the population, but again it varies by region and other characteristics. Jazz, R&B, Metal, Rap, etc., all appeal on geographic, social, economic, ethnic and other grounds.

But you can also start with any of those geographic, social, economic, ethnic, etc., grounds and study their "cultures," which will include music types, leisure-time activity preferences, professional and vocational preferences, political attitudes, and so on...

True, there are many overlapping identities and cultures which impact upon how people see the world. Sweeping statements and generalisations are often somewhat lacking ;)

I suppose a committed Marxist from Nebraska and another from Palestine might have more in common with each other than people of their respective mainstreams in terms of the lenses through which they see the world and approach other people.

Western Music (Classical) can be seen as an example of Western Culture, as contrasted from India Music, or Middle Eastern.

I would this is a superficialism of culture, but is nevertheless an important component of what goes to make it up. Of course it emphasies "high culture" rather than the "low culture" which I would venture is of more influence and a better reporter of how people are within themselves.

Much like dogs, humans are territorial and "tribal". We don;t like to think of ourselves that way, but the reality is those are very strong impulses within our species.

Can these be overcome? To an extent yes, but it's tough because so much is simply "built in" to our personal and societal psyche.

"Culture" (as in different cultures) is a human construct with ill-defined lines of demarcation. In descending order by size, we in anthropology tend to use culture, society, and sub-culture.

Gotta go.

Well yes, I agree. These are indeed human constructs, and we have an assortment of identities, which I personally think are unhealthy and should be unlearned. But people from different areas of the world do generally have different ways of looking at things, of approaching things and so on. Down to little reactions, biases, thinking methodologies, all sorts. I find it interesting to explore these different identities and approaches.

A little factoid to illustrate how artificial those things can be.

Brazil largely thought of itself as a colony of the kingdom of Portugual from 1500-something up until 1815, when it was decreed a part of the "joint Kingdom" with Portugal.

Then in 1822 the heir prince, with the accordance of the king, decided to decree Brasil a sovereign, independent country - the sole monarchy in the history of the Americas.

Then in 1889 it became a Republic (after exactly two monarchs).

In the 128 years since we had IIRC six "republics" and as many "constitutions".

History of Brazil since 1985 - Wikipedia

History of the Constitution of Brazil - Wikipedia

Clearly, we like the concepts of republic and constitution in the abstract, but have a hard time understanding them enough to make it work. In a sense it is almost like a cargo cult.

Are we a part of Western culture? Beats me. But we sure like to play the part on TV.

A lot of this is stuff happening "at the top" which the average Brazilians wouldn't have been particularly directly involved in. I think that Brazilian nationality emerged following the 1880s as in most other places, before that nationality wasn't really a thing. It especially wouldn't have been in such a mixed society as Brazil.

Nevertheless, a country with plenty of potential!
 

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
I'm not going to attempt a definition of culture, despite having read Anthropology at university, but I will say that it's nested, so to speak.

In a sense we can talk about Western culture, which is clearly different in many respects from Islamic culture. But within Western culture, there are the individual national cultures: consider the many debates in this forum between USians and Europeans over free speech: crucial to the former, incidental to the latter. Then consider the differences within a nation, both political (Texas and California, Bavaria and Thuringia) and religious.

It's easier, then, to identify Western culture by contrasting it with other major cultures. The trouble is that this glosses over the differences. Many US Christians would be as opposed to French secularism as most Muslims are. Most Westerners support democracy, but some of us have our doubts. Luis likes republicanism, I think Brazil made a mistake!

I suppose the conclusion is that by the time you've worked your way out from clearly defined groups to "the West", the cultural continuity is so nebulous as to be of little real value. I'm conscious of being a pagan, an Anglo-Irishman, a European (just about), but I'd never say "I'm a Westerner".
 

Kirran

Premium Member
I'm not going to attempt a definition of culture, despite having read Anthropology at university, but I will say that it's nested, so to speak.

In a sense we can talk about Western culture, which is clearly different in many respects from Islamic culture. But within Western culture, there are the individual national cultures: consider the many debates in this forum between USians and Europeans over free speech: crucial to the former, incidental to the latter. Then consider the differences within a nation, both political (Texas and California, Bavaria and Thuringia) and religious.

It's easier, then, to identify Western culture by contrasting it with other major cultures. The trouble is that this glosses over the differences. Many US Christians would be as opposed to French secularism as most Muslims are. Most Westerners support democracy, but some of us have our doubts. Luis likes republicanism, I think Brazil made a mistake!

I suppose the conclusion is that by the time you've worked your way out from clearly defined groups to "the West", the cultural continuity is so nebulous as to be of little real value. I'm conscious of being a pagan, an Anglo-Irishman, a European (just about), but I'd never say "I'm a Westerner".

So you're saying really such a nebulous culture can be described mostly in contrast to others? Going off your Western culture is different to Islamic culture (I'll brush over the fact that there are Western Muslims...)

I am somewhat the opposite! I have no particularly strong connection to Britishness, am aware of the influence of the area I grew up in upon me (upland Ceredigion) but would probably find the identity of 'Westerner' more valid than any other in describing me. Although even that is weakly held, and I suspect I'll drop it altogether in time.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Well yes, I agree. These are indeed human constructs, and we have an assortment of identities, which I personally think are unhealthy and should be unlearned. But people from different areas of the world do generally have different ways of looking at things, of approaching things and so on. Down to little reactions, biases, thinking methodologies, all sorts. I find it interesting to explore these different identities and approaches.
You just said in a nut-shell why I was enamored by anthropology and went into that as my profession.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Actually, @Kirran , I am not sure there is such a thing as a Brazilian nationality, although a lot of effort is put into presenting it as a reality.

But what does a radical anti-nationalist such as me know about such things anyway?

And @DavidMcCann , I do not necessarily disagree with you regarding Brazil having made a mistake. We are superlative in our ability to make mistakes, and I don't think there was ever enough of a grasp of Republican principles for it to work in this place.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Actually, @Kirran , I am not sure there is such a thing as a Brazilian nationality, although a lot of effort is put into presenting it as a reality.

But what does a radical anti-nationalist such as me know about such things anyway?

We are both antinationalists, and that may well impede our abilities to understand nationalist mentalities.

But I think there is a Brazilian nationality dude. Although I do wonder if it mightn't be weaker than nationalities often are. If so - well done Brazil! Come back to my arms, all is forgiven!

That seems to be precisely what the authoritarian right using the words "western culture" do.

Oh yeah? Do go on.
 
Last edited:

Kirran

Premium Member
Ancaps, "traditional" american libertarians, authoritarian American nationalists, Nazi's, etc. will commonly talk about how most developments in the world (material or ideological) are products of the west. (Mostly because they have been indoctrinated to believe black and arab peoples are savages).

Ohhhh, I see what you mean. Yeah, a problem I have come across.
 
Top