Kooky
Freedom from Sanity
Banking elites require a state to exist. No state, no banking elites.All States are good.
The problem is banking elites.
See, anarchism solves all your problems!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Banking elites require a state to exist. No state, no banking elites.All States are good.
The problem is banking elites.
But, Johnson's government is far right because ...
1) It is trying to ban peaceful protest.
2) It lies with impunity and refuses to correct those lies even in Parliament.
3) It raises taxes on the less well off and poor
4) It is happy to starve children
5) it backs its backers by letting them pollute rivers
6) It plays the race card when it can, it won't even offer Ukranians refuge.
7) It refuses to publish reports
8) It is corrupt and won't reveal all the wasted money on Covid grants.
Banking elites require a state to exist. No state, no banking elites.
See, anarchism solves all your problems!
Will you admit that anarchism solves the problem of "banking elites"?Will you admit that the EU privileges the banking élites over the people's interests?
Will you admit that anarchism solves the problem of "banking elites"?
Like in the Soviet Union, you mean.No. Because the State can replace the banks.
I thought leftists liked Communism.Like in the Soviet Union, you mean.
You claimed that the Bolsheviks were "controlled by banking elites", so why are you advocating for Bolshevik-style control of private property?I thought leftists liked Communism.
You claimed that the Bolsheviks were "controlled by banking elites", so why are you advocating for Bolshevik-style control of private property?
Is that the kind of system you would support? A fascist dictatorship?The 1936 banking law in Italy nationalized the banking system.
So as you can see, there was a time where the State controlled free enterprise fully here.
Is that the kind of system you would support? A fascist dictatorship?
Is that a yes or a no?Is a banking dictatorship more ethical?
No. It is not.
Yet you praised Mussolini's dictatorship and its policy towards banking.A no.
Look at what the conservative governments of Europe did in Greece to a leftist government that you disdain and attacked as stooges of the "banking élites".Look at what the Troika did to Greece.
Yet you praised Mussolini's dictatorship and its policy towards banking.
Look at what the conservative governments of Europe did in Greece to a leftist government that you disdain and attacked as stooges of the "banking élites".
A political regime ruled or dominated by three powerful individuals.What is Troika? In your opinion
A political regime ruled or dominated by three powerful individuals.
See also: triumvirate.
Given how much you fawn over actual dictators while decrying representative democracy as tyrannical, I have the suspicion that you don't actually know what a "dictatorship" entails.A financial dictatorship, yes.
That spits on the EU countries' sovereignty.
Given how much you fawn over actual dictators while decrying representative democracy as tyrannical, I have the suspicion that you don't actually know what a "dictatorship" entails.