Atomist
I love you.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a deist god that doesn't intervene is essentially the same as no god existing... so is there a reason why people should hold a deist position than over the position that no such god exist?
I mean when atheist give arguments against gods the arguments are always for theistic gods (particularly intervening ones).
Unless it's some nebulous argument like there is no evidence for god therefore belief in god is unjustified. But such an argument doesn't address existence.
I mean when atheist give arguments against gods the arguments are always for theistic gods (particularly intervening ones).
Unless it's some nebulous argument like there is no evidence for god therefore belief in god is unjustified. But such an argument doesn't address existence.