InChrist
Free4ever
What if you are wrong? What if God is truly good, loving and you are totally mistaken?If god exists it is a an evil psycho!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What if you are wrong? What if God is truly good, loving and you are totally mistaken?If god exists it is a an evil psycho!
What if you are wrong? What if God is truly good, loving and you are totally mistaken?
One thing that I've always had trouble accepting is that people who do not believe in the "true" religion will suffer in hell for eternity. I have been told that it's our choice: either we choose God or we choose to be apart from Him and we reap what we sow.
But if God is really all-knowing, then God should know the future. This means that God should be aware that billions of people will never choose his true religion, for various reasons. No matter how many signs or mercies God sends upon these people, they will not choose the true religion unless God hijacks their free will. So...why would God test people when He already knows who will be burning in hell forever? Why create people who He knows from the start will receive eternal damnation? Why is God so intent on receiving our worship when He doesn't actually benefit from it?
I have a hard time linking this with the concept of a loving God. Can someone please help me here?
If the future can be known, then we live in a deterministic universe. (No god required or excluded.)
In a deterministic universe there is no free will. (Not even a god would have free will.)
That is the primary contradiction in your thinking. You have to get rid of omniscience (determinism) or you have to get rid of "free will" (even the free will of your god). Without that decision you will turn in circles forever.
If you start with a fallacy as premise, you will never know the truth.
When you claim to know how to play football, that's not the same as knowing the future.I believe knowing is not determination. I know how to play football but that does not determine that I will play it.
Do you have the Bible thrown in your face all the time? And what specifically do mean by "the Bible thrown in our face all the time"?Then we wouldn't have to have the Bible thrown in our faces all the time.
I don't see it that way. God, or an entity, knowing what you will have for breakfast tomorrow does not mean God chose for you, or you of your own volition, were unable to freely chose what to eat for breakfast. I don't see "knowing" as meaning "choosing".When you claim to know how to play football, that's not the same as knowing the future.
Imagine that there is an entity that knows what you'll have for breakfast tomorrow. That means you are not able to decide otherwise, or, in other words, you don't have free will. If you could decide otherwise, it means that the entity didn't know the future.
I didn't say that knowing means choosing. It is simply a logic impossibility to have free will in a deterministic world. You can't have both. You can have neither or one but not both.I don't see it that way. God, or an entity, knowing what you will have for breakfast tomorrow does not mean God chose for you, or you of your own volition, were unable to freely chose what to eat for breakfast. I don't see "knowing" as meaning "choosing".
Do you have the Bible thrown in your face all the time? And what specifically do mean by "the Bible thrown in our face all the time"?
I wonder what is nonsense about Revelation 11:18 BThat house was my childhood home. My late father used to shoot the rats which infested the place. However, that has nothing to do with the nonsense book of Revelation.
I disagree. From the biblical perspective anyway, God exists in an eternal realm outside of time and therefore sees past, present, and future of the time realm humans live within here on earth. So a person can make a completely free choice about what to eat for breakfast, which God observes and knows, yet without determining the choice of that person makes.I didn't say that knowing means choosing. It is simply a logic impossibility to have free will in a deterministic world. You can't have both. You can have neither or one but not both.
The only other option is to reject logic.
Do you mean Dominion, Kingdom Now type Christians, or do you mean all Christians?Fundy Christians try to make our country run by their view of Christianity and want favoritism.
'Christianity', changes, morphs, I don't understand most christians, religiously, and that seems to be connected to non religious ideas. Some denominations don't seem 'religious', at all, and overall the concepts seem odd or attributing to strange ideas both concerning religion, and outside religion.
That being said, if one reads the Bible, they may not reach the same ideas as those.
Now, basically what this means is that many christians are practicing a type of pseudo-religion, which often contradicts direct ideas, in the Bible. I wouldn't call that 'fundamentalism', it's something else.
Your ^ above ^ post reminded me of Jeremiah 29:11; 31:3.I disagree. From the biblical perspective anyway, God exists in an eternal realm outside of time and therefore sees past, present, and future of the time realm humans live within here on earth. So a person can make a completely free choice about what to eat for breakfast, which God observes and knows, yet without determining the choice of that person makes.
Do you mean Dominion, Kingdom Now type Christians, or do you mean all Christians?
Do you think all people should have freedom to voice their views in this country?
Do you think the Christians you refer to are the only people in this country who want favoritism?
Let's take it step by step to see where exactly we disagree.I disagree. From the biblical perspective anyway, God exists in an eternal realm outside of time and therefore sees past, present, and future of the time realm humans live within here on earth. So a person can make a completely free choice about what to eat for breakfast, which God observes and knows, yet without determining the choice of that person makes.
I find Jesus is interested in quality over quantity.Mostly the dominionist/reconstructionist types. Certainly the Christian Left is not interested in that. Voicing yes, but getting their religion the preferred one, no. I don't think other religions have that issue in the US currently.
Even back in the 80's Pres. Reagan saw the 'potential to push' by paying ' lip service ' to the fundies.Fundy Christians try to make our country run by their view of Christianity and want favoritism.
One thing that I've always had trouble accepting is that people who do not believe in the "true" religion will suffer in hell for eternity. I have been told that it's our choice: either we choose God or we choose to be apart from Him and we reap what we sow.
But if God is really all-knowing, then God should know the future. This means that God should be aware that billions of people will never choose his true religion, for various reasons. No matter how many signs or mercies God sends upon these people, they will not choose the true religion unless God hijacks their free will. So...why would God test people when He already knows who will be burning in hell forever? Why create people who He knows from the start will receive eternal damnation? Why is God so intent on receiving our worship when He doesn't actually benefit from it?
I have a hard time linking this with the concept of a loving God. Can someone please help me here?