Weeping Raven
One lost Raven
As the title says, I'm curious to hear your responses, long or short!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wouldn't that be a 'demon' or 'daimon' ?All of them are spirits. At least, that's how I think of them. Conscious, active energy that people associated to images. I don't think there is much more to that.
Wouldn't that be a 'demon' or 'daimon' ?
Welcome to the Left Hand Path DIR. Have some cookies.A category of mythological beings probably inspired by psychosis.
An aspect of our unconscious mind that is conscious in its own respect.As the title says, I'm curious to hear your responses, long or short!
Welcome to the Left Hand Path DIR. Have some cookies.
Actually, it's a good subject to bring up. Is it better to keep your unconscious psychoses repressed, or to bring them into consciousness and work through them? Sure, there can be some disorientation when the chaotic content from the unconscious is brought into consciousness before you can start to make sense of it. Is this period of disorientation worth it, or is it better to keep the psychological complexes repressed?Thanks for the cookies. I just deleted my post.
It is? I rather had equated atman with consciousness as it's described to be without attributes.One's Dæmon is very similar to the Vedic Atman
Atman is a kind of liaison between man and Brahman, replace Brahman with the LHP Higher Self and Atman with Dæmon and there ya go.It is? I rather had equated atman with consciousness as it's described to be without attributes.
But then I'm not that familiar with Vedic Hinduism and it might differ from those kinds I know.
This would be a form of Solipsism, and does not leave room for other minds. Brahman is universal, not personal, so this would be RHP joining with the universe. (Universe as higher self.)Atman is a kind of liaison between man and Brahman, replace Brahman with the LHP Higher Self and Atman with Dæmon and there ya go.
I never said the Atman / Brahman thing wasn't RHP . . . indeed it is just as Vamachara is really RHP although it means 'left handed' or something.This would be a form of Solipsism, and does not leave room for other minds. Brahman is universal, not personal, so this would be RHP joining with the universe. (Universe as higher self.)
Your metaphor does not fit. This part is ok:I never said the Atman / Brahman thing wasn't RHP . . . indeed it is just as Vamachara is really RHP although it means 'left handed' or something.
Atman is a kind of liaison between man and Brahman,
replace Brahman with the LHP Higher Self and Atman with Dæmon and there ya go.
Of course they're not the same exactly, one is a monotheistic RHP while the Dæmon and higher Self belongs to the Western LHP.Your metaphor does not fit. This part is ok:
but this part is a total misrepresentation of the terms used, as Brahman is universal and impersonal.
@Kapalika if you would like to clear this up, it would be much appreciated! Thank you.
Wouldn't that be a 'demon' or 'daimon' ?
Quoting the broadcast:Of course they're not the same exactly, one is a monotheistic RHP while the Dæmon and higher Self belongs to the Western LHP.
Around 12 min into the podcast the Atman / Brahman is explained
KHPR 011: Yogic Self Transformation