firedragon
Veteran Member
You quoted the full OP. It consisted of just one line.
View attachment 43138
OP question: "provide example of any harm in NOT believing god"
Your answer: "can make assumptions only. nothing concrete."
I have no idea how else to understand your answer then in the way I said that I understood it. And that way is that one requires belief in god in order to know things for certain. How else could I understand it?
Instead of just saying that I "misunderstood completely", why don't you try clarifying then what you actually meant?
I'm genuinely curious and I have no clue why you feel the need to be so mysterious about it.
The Question: What harm do you see in not believing in God.
Answer: I can only make some assumptions as answer to that question. Nothing concrete.