Cherub786
Member
So one ******* is enough to discredit transgender people as a whole?
I’ve worked with the public. I have a plethora of horror stories about human nature if you like. And I certainly don’t want to be associated with the disgusting things I’ve witnessed straight cis women do.
And most predators won’t care about stick figures on the doors.
I need something more logical than one jerk being a jerk. Because guess what? Many predators can also take advantage of babysitting gigs. Guess we should ban all nannies because of some predatory *******. Right?
The line of reasoning just seems rather illogical to me.
I'm not attempting to discredit transgender people as individuals. I am critical of a political movement, which I refer to as, for lack of a better alternative, the transgender movement. And I am not alone in my criticism of this movement, the most prominent element that likewise criticizes them (for many but not all of the same reasons as I do) are feminists, derisively called TERFs.
We both agree on this fundamental principle: the legal status as male or female must be determined by the biological sex someone was assigned to at birth. Is that really such a scandalous, controversial idea?