sandandfoam
Veteran Member
Trying to hold the exercise of war to standards of civility is rather naive.
I can't argue with that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trying to hold the exercise of war to standards of civility is rather naive.
My neighbor is related to that guy; he's never met him but his extended family said that despite talking about it haunting him sometimes, he otherwise "slept like a baby at night."
why was it acceptable before and not now?
Are you sure?Because society progresses.
I was watching a documentary about Hiroshima last night. I found it very disturbing and it left me wondering - were the crew of the Enola Gay war criminals?
I think they were.
Maybe not them, but I think if Rudolf Hoss was a war criminal, then Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill and Stalin must certainly have just as bad in terms of the number of people they killed.
However, the fact that Allies committed war crimes does not necessarily mean that the Axis did not do the same.
I was watching a documentary about Hiroshima last night. I found it very disturbing and it left me wondering - were the crew of the Enola Gay war criminals?
I think they were.
That excuse didn't fly at the Nuremberg trials. :bonk:No. They were soldiers.
I have no remorse over what my country did and if we had a do over id pull the release handle myself.
The dropping of the bombs again saved countless civilian lives due to the RUTHLESS Japaneese leaders stubborness.
THOSE men on that plane are HEROS and ARE remembered as such.
When I call the Japaneese leaders of the time RUTHLESS, I'll let you know that is a understatement and the words that need to really be expressed cannot be due to forum rules.
They called up and begged for it, and received it.
It may well have stopped a war.
The Japanese were brutal, no doubt about it.
The bomb freed a lot of prisoners, and it also bought a lot of people home, including my Grandad, who was fighting the Japs in Burma when the bomb was dropped, and had spent 3 years fighting them in the Burmese jungle.
It was still a war crime, no point glossing over it.
War crime, not a chance.
It was a life saving choice, orders given from the top and followed.
so? it can very well be both.
War crime, not a chance.
It was a life saving choice, orders given from the top and followed.
Thats not glossing over anything. That was a gift for them to save lives..
It wasn't life saving. 250,000 civilains were murdered, and the Geneva convention would disagree with you. We are all entitled to opinion, but the law is pretty clear.
Trying to hold the exercise of war to standards of civility is rather naive.
the geneva conv, does not have the authority to save countless millions of lives.
Only the USA did. Murder isnt the right word for it.
IT was life saving. Learn the history before you comment on something your not aware of.
Millions of people would have been killed, had we not dropped those bombs forcing surrender. we would have carpet bombed the whole country with incidiary devices .