• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

We have a female Prime Minister

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
A policy is a stance, right. Policies become tangible whenever a Parliament makes laws.
The Prime Minister has the executive power. It is the Parliament that passes laws.
Why can't you answer a very simple question? If you know and like this candidate, you must know what POLICIES they want implemented.

So, tell me, what are they?

I am losing patience rapidly.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Why can't you answer a very simple question? If you know and like this candidate, you must know what POLICIES they want implemented.

So, tell me, what are they?

I am losing patience rapidly.

Do you know Orban?
She agrees with Orban...on so many things.
So since you know who Orbàn is...and what his policies are...it's not difficult to figure out what kind of policies she will implement.
I also started a thread some months ago

The ideological conflict in Europe
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
Do you know Orban?
She agrees with Orban...on so many things.
So since you know who Orbàn is...and what his policies are...it's not difficult to figure out what kind of policies she will implement.
I also started a thread some months ago

The ideological conflict in Europe
Okay, I'm going to stop asking you now.

I find it very suspicious that you are so unwilling to talk about specific policies. I can only assume you either don't know her policies and voted for her blindly for some reason, or you do know her policies but you know that they are extremely bad and don't want to bring them up.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
I and my female friends have been crying for hours, today. :):heartpulse::greenheart::heart: Out of joy.
You can't even imagine what this means.
In a country where the patriarchate is still strong. We have never had female monarchs, not even during monarchy because that was not allowed by the Lex Salica.

That's a beautiful, incredibly beautiful day for the women of all of Europe. Especially because we are the first Latin country in Europe to have a female head of Government.


She says: I swear to be loyal to the Republic, to respect the Law and the Constitution faithfully, and to perform my duties serving the Nation's exclusive interest.


Yeah, so what? Since the end of World War II in 1945, Italy has had new governments at an average of one every 1.11 years. Statistically, she won't last long. Your euphoria will be short lived.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I and my female friends have been crying for hours, today. :):heartpulse::greenheart::heart: Out of joy.
You can't even imagine what this means.
In a country where the patriarchate is still strong. We have never had female monarchs, not even during monarchy because that was not allowed by the Lex Salica.

That's a beautiful, incredibly beautiful day for the women of all of Europe. Especially because we are the first Latin country in Europe to have a female head of Government.


She says: I swear to be loyal to the Republic, to respect the Law and the Constitution faithfully, and to perform my duties serving the Nation's exclusive interest.

This is probably a little out of place, but I couldn't help it. The following is a speech by the Archbishop of Canterbury explaining to King Henry V why the Law Salique regarding female inheritance does NOT apply. (For those unaccustomed to the play, or the language, the speech is supposed to be funny, and it takes a brilliant actor to deliver it really well.)

Then hear me, gracious sovereign, and you peers,
That owe yourselves, your lives and services
To this imperial throne. There is no bar
To make against your highness' claim to France
But this, which they produce from Pharamond,
'In terram Salicam mulieres ne succedant:'
'No woman shall succeed in Salique land:'
Which Salique land the French unjustly gloze
To be the realm of France, and Pharamond
The founder of this law and female bar.
Yet their own authors faithfully affirm
That the land Salique is in Germany,
Between the floods of Sala and of Elbe;
Where Charles the Great, having subdued the Saxons,
There left behind and settled certain French;
Who, holding in disdain the German women
For some dishonest manners of their life,
Establish'd then this law; to wit, no female
Should be inheritrix in Salique land:
Which Salique, as I said, 'twixt Elbe and Sala,
Is at this day in Germany call'd Meisen.
Then doth it well appear that Salique law
Was not devised for the realm of France:
Nor did the French possess the Salique land
Until four hundred one and twenty years
After defunction of King Pharamond,
Idly supposed the founder of this law;
Who died within the year of our redemption
Four hundred twenty-six; and Charles the Great
Subdued the Saxons, and did seat the French
Beyond the river Sala, in the year
Eight hundred five. Besides, their writers say,
King Pepin, which deposed Childeric,
Did, as heir general, being descended
Of Blithild, which was daughter to King Clothair,
Make claim and title to the crown of France.
Hugh Capet also, who usurped the crown
Of Charles the duke of Lorraine, sole heir male
Of the true line and stock of Charles the Great,
To find his title with some shows of truth,
'Through, in pure truth, it was corrupt and naught,
Convey'd himself as heir to the Lady Lingare,
Daughter to Charlemain, who was the son
To Lewis the emperor, and Lewis the son
Of Charles the Great. Also King Lewis the Tenth,
Who was sole heir to the usurper Capet,
Could not keep quiet in his conscience,
Wearing the crown of France, till satisfied
That fair Queen Isabel, his grandmother,
Was lineal of the Lady Ermengare,
Daughter to Charles the foresaid duke of Lorraine:
By the which marriage the line of Charles the Great
Was re-united to the crown of France.
So that, as clear as is the summer's sun.
King Pepin's title and Hugh Capet's claim,
King Lewis his satisfaction, all appear
To hold in right and title of the female:
So do the kings of France unto this day;
Howbeit they would hold up this Salique law
To bar your highness claiming from the female,
And rather choose to hide them in a net
Than amply to imbar their crooked titles
Usurp'd from you and your progenitors.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
To begin with, I am a socialist. Meloni is a Conservative Prime Minister.
We are both Souverainists.

Her policies will focus on implementing all the laws and constitution articles protecting the country's sovereignty.
From an economic point of view, an intelligent protectionism (Marine Le Pen always speaks of).
From a cultural point of view, the defense of our juridical values, of our secular juridical tradition, of the European culture in general.

She accepted a nomination to run for the European Parliament. How does that not make a wannabe 'elitist?'
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Before these challenges, there are no possible mediations.
Either we say yes, or we say no.


Yes to sexual identity. No to gender ideology.
Yes to the culture of life. No to the abyss of death.
Yes to employment for our citizens. No to international high finance.
Yes to the nations' sovereignty. No to Brussels bureaucrats.
And yes to our civilization and no to those who want to undo it.


G. Meloni
 
Last edited:

Sand Dancer

Crazy Cat Lady
Before these challenges, there are no possible mediations.
Either we say yes, or we say no.
Yes to natural family. No to the LGBT lobby.
Yes to sexual identity. No to gender ideology.
Yes to the culture of life. No to the abyss of death.
Yes to the universality of the cross. No to the Islamist violence.
Yes to safe borders. No to mass immigration.
Yes to employment for our citizens. No to international high finance.
Yes to the nations' sovereignty. No to Brussels bureaucrats.
And yes to our civilization and no to those who want to undo it.


G. Meloni

But doesn't she want to serve her LGBT constituents?
The cross isn't universal though.There are others religions than Christianity and Islam.

I like 6 though.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
But doesn't she want to serve her LGBT constituents?
The cross isn't universal though.There are others religions than Christianity and Islam.

I like 6 though.
Extremists exist anywhere. She meant that in Christian majority countries atheists are not discriminated against.
Or as for LGBTs, the State should defend their rights, not the lobbies.
 

Sand Dancer

Crazy Cat Lady
Extremists exist anywhere. She meant that in Christian majority countries atheists are not discriminated against.
Or as for LGBTs, the State should defend their rights, not the lobbies.

In the US they are. Glad it's different there. Not a fan of lobbyists either.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
In the US they are. Glad it's different there. Not a fan of lobbyists either.
Being a populist means to defend anyone, regardless of gender, religion, race, personal conditions, political opinions.
Populism was born because there was need of it.
 
Top