Since I am an European and I don't understand American politicians that much..could you please explain this video to me?
Thank you very much Americans
Thank you very much Americans
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hillary was being flippant. We didn't kill ghadaff.
Explain yourself. I would appreciate details.Hillary was being flippant. We didn't kill ghadaff.
Explain yourself. I would appreciate details.
Flippant means frivolously disrespectful, shallow, or lacking in seriousness; characterized by levity.
The US didn't kill Ghaddafi, A Libyan mob killed him.
But she said "we came". Who's we?
The US and NATO.
The US didn't kill Ghaddafi, A Libyan mob killed him.
Did you know that Hillary came to read her emails at the Ambrosetti Forum...some weeks ago?The mob might have very well did it on their own but considering U.S. direct support of the Azov in the Ukraine and all the other shenanigans over the years it wouldn't be that much of a leap of the imagination to suspect that though the U.S. military cut ties with Azov that the CIA didn't mind the neo-Nazi ties if it overall served U.S. purposes, we've used far worse people. The "mob" may very well have had a little encouragement which would make sense, they kill him and our hands are clean and secrets die with him.
But this is just speculation
Did you know that Hillary came to read her emails at the Ambrosetti Forum...some weeks ago?
Yes. We do care. Libya was a former colony of ours...and had become one of the wealthiest countries in the Mediterranean. We had invested money, projects, infrastructures in it. Gaddafi had signed the treaty of Benghazi, with which he had become Italy's privileged economic partner and coowner of some Italian state assets.@Estro Felino
Out of curiosity, do Italians care about the negative consequences of the NATO battles in Libya, in 2011, which the U.S., in general, and Hillary Clinton, in particular manipulated into being:
- Because Italians care about human tragedies as a general rule; or
- Because Italians care about human tragedies in Libya in particular, or
- Because Italy has had to endure internal turmoil due to the consequences of the Fall of Libya and all the Libyan refugees fleeing to the nearest country across the Mediterranean Sea?
Watch the video in post #10. See that lady? If she becomes Prime Minister, she will
- Hillary who?
- Oh, that Hillary. So, sue her.
The mob might have very well did it on their own but considering U.S. direct support of the Azov in the Ukraine and all the other shenanigans over the years it wouldn't be that much of a leap of the imagination to suspect that though the U.S. military cut ties with Azov that the CIA didn't mind the neo-Nazi ties if it overall served U.S. purposes, we've used far worse people. The "mob" may very well have had a little encouragement which would make sense, they kill him and our hands are clean and secrets die with him.
But this is just speculation
Yes. We do care. Libya was a former colony of ours...and had become one of the wealthiest countries in the Mediterranean. We had invested money, projects, infrastructures in it. Gaddafi had signed the treaty of Benghazi, with which he had become Italy's privileged economic partner and coowner of some Italian state assets.
Gaddafi's downfall provoked the destruction of a country, a great migration wave from SubSaharan Africa...
Italy lost billions of Euros in investments and spends 5-6 billions of euros per year to manage the migration crisis.
Since I am an European and I don't understand American politicians that much..could you please explain this video to me?
Thank you very much Americans
Also because France still controls its former colonial empire through the CFA Franc and other expedients.Hillary is gloating about succeeding at killing Gaddafi, where Reagan had previously failed.
So, that was her way of demonstrating that she's better at being a right-wing warmonger than Reagan was.