Fair enough, we will see. I think we can also be certain that if it doesn't do much on the first pass, I can see it being appealed multiple times.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Walmart and Dick's Sporting Goods Sued
- Thread starter esmith
- Start date
And other plaintiff's would file suits too.
Different judges...different decisions.
Think this will make to the federal level?
Possibly.
Trump appears interested in some additional gun control,
& this would be one small area which could change.
I have been out of the Trump loop for a few days. (It has been peaceful, really!) What is he proposing?
A Trump free weekend?
Woo hoo!
Stricter regulation of bump stocks is one specific proposal.
And he's urging lawmakers to agree upon something.
We'll see what actually happens.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Actually, I implore everyone to point it out whenever and wherever it occurs.
What part of my post do you think said anything at all about what anyone should or shouldn't do?
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Seriously? It seems the only 'raison d'etre' for most of your posts is to implant your idea of what should or should not be on the lives of others.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And in regards to this discussion let's not forget "Take the firearms first, go through due process later."
Trump: 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'
Probably what they should have done in the first place if they were going to take a moral stance on this instead of making a public gesture to appease the public outcry.
Oh, is that all?
Yes, we can't have private businesses deciding what they want to do. We need government intervention so by implications you are a big-government type just like us who want to sue businesses that don't serve wedding cakes to gays etc. Welcome to the big government, semi-socialist club.
esmith
Veteran Member
from the article:
This law, officially adopted on 26 October 2005, is the law to which Hillary Clinton was referring in 2015 when she stated “the gun industry and gun sellers are the only business in America that is totally free of liability for their behavior.” Claims that they are totally free of liability, however, are not totally precise.
Well, there's a confidence inspiring suggestion!
Not all....just one of the things he said.Oh, is that all?
(I never claimed he's eloquent.)
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I bet that statement caused mass sphincter contraction among NRA members!
Oh, I was making a joke at the expense of lawmakers and their perpetual ability to never agree on whats for lunch, much less on legislation.
Now your going by Clinton’s interpretation, now that’s rich. Notice the part it says “totally free from liability is not precise”. They got that right.
......and the ACLU.