• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Walk Like An Egyptian

OtherSheep

<--@ Titangel

________________________
References

"Halévy's scientific activity has been very extensive, and his writings on Oriental philology and archeology, which display great originality and ingenuity, have earned for him a worldwide reputation. He is especially known through his controversies with eminent Assyriologists concerning the non-Semitic Sumerian idiom found in the Assyro-Babylonian inscriptions. Contrary to the generally admitted opinion, Halévy put forward the theory that Sumerian is not a language, but merely an ideographic method of writing invented by the Semitic Babylonians themselves."
Joseph Halévy - Wikipedia

Die Sumerische Frage : Weissbach, F. H. (Franz Heinrich), 1865-1944 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
 
Last edited:

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
So far no debate topic has been presented. State your position and the point of the thread. You keep criticizing everyone for not grasping points, but you wont say what they are. That seems rude. The title walk like an egyptian is interesting but nebulous.
 

OtherSheep

<--@ Titangel
So far no debate topic has been presented. State your position and the point of the thread. You keep criticizing everyone for not grasping points, but you wont say what they are. That seems rude. The title walk like an egyptian is interesting but nebulous.

Kinda thought I did... here, lemme help you:

Joseph brother's didn't notice a strange-looking-Egyptian Joseph

"They clearly state that the first “Greeks” were Egyptians"

who's who: When Genesis was written

Welsh doesn't fit into Sanscrit language parameters

Either that, or I'm sticking with my out-of-Egypt theory.

"The Mitannis spoke a language called Hurrian, unrelated to Sanskrit."

language doesn't get from point A to point B via feathers on the wind... people brought it.

Genesis 15:16 "And in the fourth generation they shall return hither, for the sins of the Amorites are not yet filled up"-- they being Abram's people.

Had I to guess, from the Egyptian Monuments, I'd say that the Amorites are Nordic, by facial structure, height, and hair color.

The early Armenians were conquested by (among others) the Assyrians, which is probably why an inscription written in old Armenian shows up in Babylon... and written about the supreme god of Armenia: "Hur of Khaldi."

Synopsis:
Since the Egyptians drew the portraits of the races we obviously still see today, why does "conventional wisdom" so vehemently disagree with who and where? The conventional-wisdom-people go so far as to argue against the Bible from amongst whose pages many of their peers claim their heritage exists.

Walk Like An Egyptian: look at those Monuments, read what the Inscriptions say, and evaluate the words of the Bible up against the Archaeological evidence... drawing our own conclusions about who, what, when, and where... not letting other people tell us what to think, any more than we'd let an enemy write our histories for us.
 
Last edited:

OtherSheep

<--@ Titangel
... Zeus was fed Milk and Honey on Crete by Melisseus, the demigod of honey and beekeeping, one of the Euboean Corybantes. And the eleusinian mysteries were born, which are all about baptism to wash away sins by the reflux of the sea, as Homer says. The Son of God coming with baptism would have been immediately recognized by Cretans, as would the saying of Isaiah 7:14-15.

Because Crete is the birthplace of Zeus and West-European Civilization, the Labyrinth shows the path of the dioscouri. The stones of Knossos, Troy, Tragliatella, and Avebury all have the same children as their builders. Those builders belong to Pelasgian Zeus, and were the sons and daughters of Zeus, the dioscouri. Homer calls them the "divine Pelasgians".

Sir Arthur Evans' gift to the world was the excavation of the Palace/Temple of Knossos. It's up to the children of Zeus, God of the Bright Sky, to keep digging. The Greeks who invaded them, misunderstood what the Pelasgians had left behind, and recreated the truth as their mythology... a history which had nothing to do with them. Never let victorious invaders write your history for you.

Stonehenge was nothing more than a fortified castle, with a strong outer wall and a lesser inner wall and rubble in between. This type of construction even shows up in fictions, so it's hardly unheard of. And archaeology has Troy with the same builders, and the same "troy towns" are everywhere in Britain... until some religion decides that having the truth in plain sight hurts their cause, and knocks down a few more of what they choose to call idols... which are actually proof of ownership, and belonging to other people. Covetousness in the name of faith. ugh

Avebury, England.

"Avebury, Stonehenge and Glastonbury form a right angled triangle accurate to within 1/1000. The 'St. Michaels' ley-line from Glastonbury to Avebury coincides with the Mayday sunrise, crossing the longest possible stretch of Southern Britain. The ley runs from St. Michael's mount to Brent tor, Cadbury, Trull, Creech St Michael, Lyng, Othery, Burrowbrigde, Glastonbury, Buckland dingham, Avebury, Ogbourne St George, East Hendred and Bury St Edmonds (All these sites have or had churches dedicated to the dragon-killing Saints Michael and George)."

The Kymry have a saying about the red dragon trying to vanquish the white dragon. The red dragon is Wales, just as the red men of the Aegean used to be called Cretan Pelasgians. The white dragon is represented as usurpers.

The same thing happened to Crete by the "crest-shaking Dorians" and to Troy by the same people. Troy was taken by fire, just as the Amarna Tablets say were Babylon and Palestine and Hatti... this was the coming of the Greeks... which Homer calls Achaean, and others call Viking pirates. The 10 year seige became necessary because they had to go steal supplies, since their homeland wasn't close at hand. I believe them to be Persians, who knew to come later, as Cyrus to rape and pillage and inhabit. Covetousness is murder.

Although the story of Brutus in England is defaced so much that the father wouldn't recognize it, the myth has a basis in fact. Crete to Troy to Tuscany to Britain are the reality, minus a few stops along the way. Evans tells us that the Cretan script matches the Iberian in very many letters. And we are told by the oldest historians that southern Spain had 6,000 year old letters. And the Druids used Greek letters, according to Caesar... which were probably not Greek at all, but were Pelasgian, since Herodotus even calls them Pelasgian letters... which is the tip of the iceberg Evans has uncovered regarding the true birth of the alphabet, in Scripta Minoa. But the Romans destroyed the makers' marks just as the Vatican et al did. Covetousness, in spades... dug up by spades ;)
 
Last edited:
Top