• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Wagner chief Prigozhin killed in Plane Crash

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Oh, the fallacy of something being inevitable.
I see opportunity to influence.
Tis not a foregone conclusion that Russia will conquer Ukraine & other neighbors.
Neither is it certain that China will conquer more of SE Asia.

Nothing is certain. I was addressing your statement that "China would be emboldened" if the Russians succeed in Ukraine - which I agree is not a foregone conclusion. But if China is emboldened, it doesn't appear to have anything to do with Russia or Ukraine, but more in its direct relationship and dealings with the United States.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Oh, the fallacy of inevitability.
I see opportunity to influence.
Tis no foregone conclusion that Russia will conquer Ukraine & more.
.
So far, nothing proves Russia intends to conquer the whole of Ukraine.
So...I don't understand why she should be emboldened....by whom?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Nothing is certain. I was addressing your statement that "China would be emboldened" if the Russians succeed in Ukraine.....
It's not fundamentally about Russia succeeding.
It's whether the west makes violent conquest too
costly to pursue.
But if China is emboldened, it doesn't appear to have anything to do with Russia or Ukraine, but more in its direct relationship and dealings with the United States.
China gears up its military for more than just
ability to take Taiwan & the S China Sea.
It doesn't need nuclear subs & hypersonic
nuclear missiles for that. Its capabilities
currently appear to low for war with the west.
But that is changing.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
So far, nothing proves Russia intends to conquer the whole of Ukraine.
So...I don't understand why she should be emboldened....by whom?
There are indicators that Russia has plans to expand beyond Ukraine.
The Church supports it. Such is that flavor of Christianity.
The risk appears real.

 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
There are indicators that Russia has plans to expand beyond Ukraine.
The risk appears real.

Anything written in Cyrillic? Is there anything that confirms this desire to conquer Europe?
I mean... of course the West's propaganda is based upon the fact that Putin wants to dominate all of Europa. First Kiev, then Warsaw, then Berlin, then Paris...right?
But they are just conjectures. I haven't read anything about these plans, in Russian.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Anything written in Cyrillic?
You're free to search.
I can't read that anymore anyway.
Is there anything that confirms this desire to conquer Europe?
I mean... of course the West's propaganda is based upon the fact that Putin wants to dominate all of Europa. First Kiev, then Warsaw, then Berlin, then Paris...right?
But they are just conjectures. I haven't read anything about these plans, in Russian.
My conjectures are better than your conjectures,
eg, that USA wants to steal Russia.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
My conjectures are better than your conjectures,
eg, that USA wants to steal Russia.
First of all, I have never said the United States wants to steal something from Russia.
I have said certain banking dynasties overseas who happen to live in UK too...so go figure.

If these banking dynasties sign a document at a notary where they guarantee they will never touch the nationalized banking system and the nationalized gas company of Russia, I will say: Sorry, I was wrong. My apologies.,

Have they done it? Will they do it? No. ;)
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
It's not fundamentally about Russia succeeding.
It's whether the west makes violent conquest too
costly to pursue.

Perhaps, though it's costing the West, too.

China gears up its military for more than just
ability to take Taiwan & the S China Sea.
It doesn't need nuclear subs & hypersonic
nuclear missiles for that. Its capabilities
currently appear to low for war with the west.
But that is changing.

Perhaps so, but then it comes down to what the West is prepared and willing to do about it, if it ever comes to some kind of confrontation.

Mao once referred to the U.S. as a paper tiger, and they seemingly saw (and continue to see) the U.S. as soft, spoiled, complacent, and internally rotten to the point of self-destruction. For a country like ours, whose leadership is so afraid of "appearing weak" in the eyes of our enemies, they sure don't do a heck of a lot to hide those weaknesses.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
First of all, I have never said the United States wants to steal something from Russia.
Oh, sure.
I have said certain banking dynasties overseas who happen to live in UK too...so go figure.

If these banking dynasties sign a document at a notary where they guarantee they will never touch the nationalized banking system and the nationalized gas company of Russia, I will say: Sorry, I was wrong. My apologies.,

Have they done it? Will they do it? No. ;)
Banking dynasties run by the Jews, the Deep State, & the Illuminati, eh.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Perhaps, though it's costing the West, too.
Doing nothing portends costing much more later on.

Are you buying the MAGA argument against
defending Ukraine because of financial burden?
Perhaps so, but then it comes down to what the West is prepared and willing to do about it, if it ever comes to some kind of confrontation.
Or Russia's & China's belief that the
west would make such conquest
unprofitable.
Mao once referred to the U.S. as a paper tiger, and they seemingly saw (and continue to see) the U.S. as soft, spoiled, complacent, and internally rotten to the point of self-destruction.
Pre-WW2 Japan thought so too.
For a country like ours, whose leadership is so afraid of "appearing weak" in the eyes of our enemies, they sure don't do a heck of a lot to hide those weaknesses.
You seem to argue much, but
without taking any position.
Are you a bickerbot?
 
Top