• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Vote For Trump. He Wont Let Owning A Bible Become Illegal

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
That sounds like a complaint-
Dude - if I use your logic on your own comments - they don’t measure up.
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.

And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.
 

Lee Hays

Member
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.

And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.

Ok - I’m well aware of it when I complain. Even if you are not.

If logic was missing from my skill set - I’ve adopted yours - since using this forum...
That must explain your frustration.

What are the requirement for being atheist?
Is their a pamphlet - or a certain shoe I could wear? Because from what you have shown me, it’s extremely complicated to be an atheist.

All you gotta do to be “Saved” is believe Jesus Christ died for your sins. End-o-story

I think you make stuff wayyyy more complicated than they need to be.. but - that’s just me - does that make it wrong ? Nope - you can think whatever you want to.... check that name tag - it doesn’t say “thought police”...
 

Lee Hays

Member
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.

And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.

Your statements are strait up bogus

Not your sources - they may be sound - idk, idc

But you have shown to put words in people’s mouth, and change definition of words..

You can’t stick to one topic - bouncing across from side to the next;
~ It was said about my Wikipedia comment -
~ I was disparaging Wikipedia (lol - we should feel so sorry for wiki)?
~ I was relating wiki as an unreliable source?
~ I was discrediting wiki?
~ I distrust wiki?
~ And now I’m simply just complaining about wiki...


If we keep going - you may end up on my side...
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Ok - I’m well aware of it when I complain. Even if you are not.

If logic was missing from my skill set - I’ve adopted yours - since using this forum...
That must explain your frustration.

What are the requirement for being atheist?
Is their a pamphlet - or a certain shoe I could wear? Because from what you have shown me, it’s extremely complicated to be an atheist.

All you gotta do to be “Saved” is believe Jesus Christ died for your sins. End-o-story

I think you make stuff wayyyy more complicated than they need to be.. but - that’s just me - does that make it wrong ? Nope - you can think whatever you want to.... check that name tag - it doesn’t say “thought police”...
Sorry, you have not adopted my logic. Let's go over this again. The problem is not that you complained. The definition you linked confirmed that you did. The problem is that your complaint was shown to be irrational. And rather than admitting your error you started a huge detour where you tried to deny complaining in the first place.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Your statements are strait up bogus

Not your sources - they may be sound - idk, idc

But you have shown to put words in people’s mouth, and change definition of words..

You can’t stick to one topic - bouncing across from side to the next;
~ It was said about my Wikipedia comment -
~ I was disparaging Wikipedia (lol - we should feel so sorry for wiki)?
~ I was relating wiki as an unreliable source?
~ I was discrediting wiki?
~ I distrust wiki?
~ And now I’m simply just complaining about wiki...


If we keep going - you may end up on my side...
You are accusing others of your sins. And you were guilty of everything that you were accused of. Let's get back on topic.
 

Lee Hays

Member
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.

And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.

Wait...
Let me think for a second...

You said I’m complaining -
breaking it down....
I’m (in your best estimate) complaining about the fact anyone can edit wiki.

But how could I be complaining without
Sorry, you have not adopted my logic. Let's go over this again. The problem is not that you complained. The definition you linked confirmed that you did. The problem is that your complaint was shown to be irrational. And rather than admitting your error you started a huge detour where you tried to deny complaining in the first place.

fantastic -now - the problem is not that I’m complaining - moved again.... it’s simply the link I provided....
Ok - that makes sense - it took a day to explain that - my link was the issue.

You working your way over - nice
I’ve gone from;
Disparaging wiki
Discrediting wiki
Irrational - dislike? (That’s a stretch every for you)
Saying wiki is an unreliable source
Distrust wiki
Complaining about wiki

And now its moved to a problematic link...
LOL
I didn’t start a detour - lol
This whole time I’ve been defending myself - how is that directing to a detour? Unless you looking for me to roll over (which I think this is all about - for you)

Yes I’m denying that I complained - isn’t that what your arguing about?
All I’ve been doing is defending myself -
your the detour from my original “I don’t like wiki (lol - for sourcing)” - still I’m allowed to not like anything I want - for any reason I want (rational or not)

I think you missed the boat when I said -
I DON’T LIKE - regardless of anything you say or do - you can’t make me like - or dislike anything by your statements or actions -
let me know when your capitan of the thought police -
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Wait...
Let me think for a second...

You said I’m complaining -
breaking it down....
I’m (in your best estimate) complaining about the fact anyone can edit wiki.

But how could I be complaining without


fantastic -now - the problem is not that I’m complaining - moved again.... it’s simply the link I provided....
Ok - that makes sense - it took a day to explain that - my link was the issue.

You working your way over - nice
I’ve gone from;
Disparaging wiki
Discrediting wiki
Irrational - dislike? (That’s a stretch every for you)
Saying wiki is an unreliable source
Distrust wiki
Complaining about wiki

And now its moved to a problematic link...
LOL
I didn’t start a detour - lol
This whole time I’ve been defending myself - how is that directing to a detour? Unless you looking for me to roll over (which I think this is all about - for you)

Yes I’m denying that I complained - isn’t that what your arguing about?
All I’ve been doing is defending myself -
your the detour from my original “I don’t like wiki (lol - for sourcing)” - still I’m allowed to not like anything I want - for any reason I want (rational or not)

I think you missed the boat when I said -
I DON’T LIKE - regardless of anything you say or do - you can’t make me like - or dislike anything by your statements or actions -
let me know when your capitan of the thought police -
Enough trolling. You were shown to be wrong by your own link.
 

Lee Hays

Member
Enough trolling. You were shown to be wrong by your own link.

Not true - I said I don’t like wiki (for the 17 time)
Now your saying my likes are wrong ?
Your not able to decide what I like -

I’m not causing trouble - just defending myself -
But since I’m not going your direction - you decide to insult - by calling me a “troll”

Well - you failed - in changed my mind in liking wiki (as a source)
Since that was my original statement ... and you’ve been on that statement for a day now (lol)

And by the way you can’t tell me to stop trolling - if I even was - nice try ;)
 
Top