Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I said that I was not going to play a game of dictionary tag.Lol
Directly after this post - you continued ...
Can’t make up your mind?
Are you confused?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I said that I was not going to play a game of dictionary tag.Lol
Directly after this post - you continued ...
Can’t make up your mind?
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.That sounds like a complaint-
Dude - if I use your logic on your own comments - they don’t measure up.
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.
And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.
And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.
Sorry, you have not adopted my logic. Let's go over this again. The problem is not that you complained. The definition you linked confirmed that you did. The problem is that your complaint was shown to be irrational. And rather than admitting your error you started a huge detour where you tried to deny complaining in the first place.Ok - I’m well aware of it when I complain. Even if you are not.
If logic was missing from my skill set - I’ve adopted yours - since using this forum...
That must explain your frustration.
What are the requirement for being atheist?
Is their a pamphlet - or a certain shoe I could wear? Because from what you have shown me, it’s extremely complicated to be an atheist.
All you gotta do to be “Saved” is believe Jesus Christ died for your sins. End-o-story
I think you make stuff wayyyy more complicated than they need to be.. but - that’s just me - does that make it wrong ? Nope - you can think whatever you want to.... check that name tag - it doesn’t say “thought police”...
You are accusing others of your sins. And you were guilty of everything that you were accused of. Let's get back on topic.Your statements are strait up bogus
Not your sources - they may be sound - idk, idc
But you have shown to put words in people’s mouth, and change definition of words..
You can’t stick to one topic - bouncing across from side to the next;
~ It was said about my Wikipedia comment -
~ I was disparaging Wikipedia (lol - we should feel so sorry for wiki)?
~ I was relating wiki as an unreliable source?
~ I was discrediting wiki?
~ I distrust wiki?
~ And now I’m simply just complaining about wiki...
If we keep going - you may end up on my side...
It was a bit of one. Now that you can see when others complain perhaps you can see when you do it yourself.
And logic is a tool missing from your skill set.
Sorry, you have not adopted my logic. Let's go over this again. The problem is not that you complained. The definition you linked confirmed that you did. The problem is that your complaint was shown to be irrational. And rather than admitting your error you started a huge detour where you tried to deny complaining in the first place.
Haha - so your the jury -You are accusing others of your sins. And you were guilty of everything that you were accused of. Let's get back on topic.
Haha - so your the jury -
You claimed I’m guilty -
What’s the sentence? I must conform to you?
That’s what it’s all about right?
Enough trolling. You were shown to be wrong by your own link.Wait...
Let me think for a second...
You said I’m complaining -
breaking it down....
I’m (in your best estimate) complaining about the fact anyone can edit wiki.
But how could I be complaining without
fantastic -now - the problem is not that I’m complaining - moved again.... it’s simply the link I provided....
Ok - that makes sense - it took a day to explain that - my link was the issue.
You working your way over - nice
I’ve gone from;
Disparaging wiki
Discrediting wiki
Irrational - dislike? (That’s a stretch every for you)
Saying wiki is an unreliable source
Distrust wiki
Complaining about wiki
And now its moved to a problematic link...
LOL
I didn’t start a detour - lol
This whole time I’ve been defending myself - how is that directing to a detour? Unless you looking for me to roll over (which I think this is all about - for you)
Yes I’m denying that I complained - isn’t that what your arguing about?
All I’ve been doing is defending myself -
your the detour from my original “I don’t like wiki (lol - for sourcing)” - still I’m allowed to not like anything I want - for any reason I want (rational or not)
I think you missed the boat when I said -
I DON’T LIKE - regardless of anything you say or do - you can’t make me like - or dislike anything by your statements or actions -
let me know when your capitan of the thought police -
He's been imply then denying on this point for over 24 hours. Please ignore him, it's painful watching.Enough trolling. You were shown to be wrong by your own link.
Enough trolling. You were shown to be wrong by your own link.