I am pro-life on this and basically all matters, so I would highly recommend that she have the baby and then let her decide from there. But what I won't do is to try and have my position be used as a manifestation of a theocracy, especially since a clear majority of Americans did not want Roe v Wade overturned.
IOW, imo, the ends do not justify the means.
I would like to make you understand that my country (that you know very well
) rejects theocracy and the separation of Church and State is a constitutional dogma. And whoever betrays this dogma, betrays the State. A politician can be accused of High Treason, if he does.
Because the Church is alien to us, and we are supposed to be loyal to the Republic.
What does it mean? That the law about abortion was passed, despite the RCC's condemnation. And this is the evidence of this separation. And this separation will go even further because euthanasia is slowly being de-criminalized (as the Cappato case shows).
As for late term abortions, it is not religion that makes it abhorrent. It is the principle of
ius naturale . The very secular juridical science called Bioethics. Which is taught in law schools too.
After the 15th week, a perfectly healthy child cannot be aborted in Italy.
And not because of what the Church says (the Church condemns any abortion).
But because the foetus starts being sentient.
So I am sorry. I am deeply sorry. I cannot empathize with those Catholics who okay late term abortion of perfectly healthy children.