Sand Dancer
Crazy Cat Lady
Especially in their hospitals.It's difficult to say who is the "staunchest".
But it's clear that Catholics aren't alone in
wanting more theocracy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Especially in their hospitals.It's difficult to say who is the "staunchest".
But it's clear that Catholics aren't alone in
wanting more theocracy.
It's difficult to say who is the "staunchest".
But it's clear that Catholics aren't alone in
wanting more theocracy.
I don't see anyone challenging the church'sSince this is an Interfaith Discussion thread, I believe that the RCC has the right to express its own views on abortion and abortion laws.
As well as other Churches or denominations.
That said the secular state will follow other patterns, more based upon ius naturale.
Moral authority which so many politicians lack. So I guess it is not that sensible to go there.But its moral authority....that's
another matter.
I say go there.Moral authority which so many politicians lack. So I guess it is not that sensible to go there.
It is like trying to see the speck of dust in the religious field, while ignoring the log in the lay, secular one.
Matthew 7:3
Since this is a religious thread and not a political one, I need to say as a Christian that abortion is wrong.I say go there.
Many lack moral authority, not just religious leaders,
eg, justices who lied (IMO) during confirmation testimony.
I'll point anyway.Since this is a religious thread and not a political one, I need to say as a Christian that abortion is wrong.
Religiously speaking.
And so the RCC or any other Christian Church is entitled to express my very same stance.
Because there surely are impeccable and sinless Christian Churches out there, who express the same stance as the RCC, so the finger pointing at the moon is irrelevant.
I guess the SBC is a moral authority.I'll point anyway.
I loathe being lectured about sin
by those who fervently commit it.
It doesn't advance any argument,
but it's fun.
You really need to ask?Is the Southern Baptist Convention morally impeccable enough, in your eyes?
SBC leaders react to historic decision overturning Roe v. Wade | Baptist Press
That's why in a secular states there are lots of jurists who probably find abortion very bad, but they still defend it to enable every woman to choose, on the basis of their own religious, moral, philosophical convictions.You really need to ask?
I'm a fire breathing, God hating, sin loving, heathen.
I don't know their position, BTW.
We're not fully secular here...yet.That's why in a secular states there are lots of jurists who probably find abortion very bad, but they still defend it to enable every woman to choose, on the basis of their own religious, moral, philosophical convictions.
We're not fully secular here...yet.
Hmm, the deafening silence in that passage being, of course, the absence of support for contraception as a means of obviating the horrible choice of whether or not to have an abortion.What it does is to restate its position on pro-life. All the Court did was anti-abortion alone.
It is a question of developing political choices that promote conditions of existence in favor of life without falling into a priori ideological positions. This also means ensuring adequate sexual education, guaranteeing health care accessible to all and preparing legislative measures to protect the family and motherhood, overcoming existing inequalities. We need solid assistance to mothers, couples and the unborn child that involves the whole community, encouraging the possibility for mothers in difficulty to carry on with the pregnancy and to entrust the child to those who can guarantee the child’s growth.
Contraception is a sin, of course.Hmm, the deafening silence in that passage being, of course, the absence of support for contraception as a means of obviating the horrible choice of whether or not to have an abortion.
Hmm, the deafening silence in that passage being, of course, the absence of support for contraception as a means of obviating the horrible choice of whether or not to have an abortion.
This also means ensuring adequate sexual education, guaranteeing health care accessible to all and preparing legislative measures to protect the family and motherhood, overcoming existing inequalities. We need solid assistance to mothers, couples and the unborn child that involves the whole community, encouraging the possibility for mothers in difficulty to carry on with the pregnancy and to entrust the child to those who can guarantee the child’s growth.
Hmm, the deafening silence in that passage being, of course, the absence of support for contraception as a means of obviating the horrible choice of whether or not to have an abortion.
The Vatican issued a statement praising the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Dobbs case which overturned Roe v. Wade.
US Supreme Court Abortion
...and don't we all know it. This is the ridiculous position the Catholic church finds itself in: the best way by far to avoid the need for abortions is widespread and effective contraception. So the teaching of the church - and hence the reluctance of schools with a Catholic ethos to teach the importance of effective contraception in sex education - results in more abortions!I recently read that before becoming pope, John Paul I considered contraceptives, but then Paul V6 handed down 'Humane vitae'. The only birth control accepted by the church is abstaining during ovulation.
...So the teaching of the church - and hence the reluctance of schools with a Catholic ethos to teach the importance of effective contraception in sex education - results in more abortions!
But it does raise the curious question, at least for me, would a Catholic so loyal to obeying the Church on no contraception, would commit the greater sin of abortion?