I have no doubt that the majority of those killed in Gaza have been civilians - and Israel could have done a lot more to avoid civilian casualties - but some of those killed in Gaza were Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
USA Veto against Palestinians Again and again
- Thread starter Godobeyer
- Start date
I have no doubt that the majority of those killed in Gaza have been civilians - and Israel could have done a lot more to avoid civilian casualties - but some of those killed in Gaza were Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants.
And only 30 Gazan children killed in the process.
(2 Israeli children died.)
Gaza and southern Israel: More than 30 children have been killed - occupied Palestinian territory
As I say, Israel could have done a lot more to avoid civilian casualties, including the deaths of children.
Aye, but I'm more concerned with behaving in a manner
that doesn't inspire violence, eg, property taking for jJews.
Are you referring to Sheikh Jarrah?
Among others.
I believe it's intentional crimes.To force Hamas stop missiles,Hamas don't had open area or develop weapons.Not equal
But really what they except to bomb a city full civilians!!
Sheikh Jarrah is a complex situation and I'm not sure I fully understand all the facts thereof. I'm not sure it's a straightforward case of Jews unlawfully or wrongfully evicting Palestinians from their land.
Do you think it's right for Hamas and Islamic Jihad to fire rockets into populated areas of Israel?
It's an emblematic tip of the iceberg.
It's complicated.
For civilians innocent for sure no.
For settlers."they already armed" could be yes.because they taken land by force.By protection of Israel army.
If consider both wrong.I.Put all blame on Israel regime because of its racism and crimes.
If someone armed with gun want take your home.You have just a knife. It's natural you defend by knife.You have no choice.Since world don't help .
That it is.
I'm glad you think so, and I agree.
I'm not sure what you mean by this - can you elaborate?
This I'm not so sure about. If they have unlawfully and wrongfully taken Palestinian land, and by force, then there needs to be some response to that, but I'm not convinced that firing rockets at them is the right approach.
Mean.The.Palestinians don't.Have weapons.As.ISRAEL.
For .EXEMPLE YOU HAVE A.KNIFE.THE THEIF.ATTACK YOUR. FAMILY HAVE SHOTGUN.WANT.STEAL.Your HOME.
YOUR ONLY DEFENCE TOOL.IS KNIFE.
THERE.IS NO.POLICE AID OR NEIGHBORHOOD.
What choices they have instead ?
They should accept Israel.Racism.And oppression?
Are you referring to Hamas and Islamic Jihad firing rockets at the Jewish settlers?
My general position is that Hamas and Islamic Jihad have a right to fire rockets at IDF forces and infrastructure, but not at non-combatants, and I don't really think that Jewish settlers count as combatants.
Sure settlers are theifs of land , Hamas had right to attack them.
If they stole the land, then they shouldn't be killed for it. The case should go through a court of law and if found guilty, then they should be punished in proportion to the severity of the crime they have committed. I don't think firing rockets at them is a proportionate response to the theft of land. And the rockets are indiscriminate, so if they had children, those rockets would kill innocent members of their families too.