I challenge you to find posts to back up that claim.
I don't believe it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump's latest, latest dumb thing
- Thread starter Kangaroo Feathers
- Start date
I don't believe it.
How to attack another poster on RF.
He did it in this very thread.
What you believe or don't believe is your business. I'm not going to spend hours reviewing his every post and posting the results here. I stated what I believe.
shmogie
Well-Known Member
Of course your conclusions are nonsense. Republicans are content to allow the system to work, when it does. There is no need for folderol when in fact remedies are in process.
Your minimization of democrat voter fraud is somewhat amusing.
Voter fraud has been a democrat tool since the civil war, when white southern democrats used fraud to overwhelm black Republican votes.
My father never voted. When I asked him why, he said that during the depression democrat organizers paid him a dollar a vote for democrat candidates. He voted four times that day, and never again because he felt that the will of the people was not reflected in elections. Some guys voted eight or ten times that day
In the 1960 election, Johnson delivered huge swathes of Texas votes to elect Kennedy, votes that were extremely questionable, with thousands being frauds. Nixon was expected to demand a recount with all the fraud evidence, but he said after a very divisive election, he did not want to create more division.
When democrats speak of voter suppression, they are saying that they do not want any interference in their ability to cheat, voting rules such as photo ID or citizenship questions are their enemies
In California, anyone with a drivers license can vote, and illegals get drivers licenses, who do you think they will vote for, those who recognize their illegality as wrong, or those who celebrate their illegality and enable them ?
Democrat mantras include ¨the end justifies the means¨ which is held by many.
shmogie
Well-Known Member
Yep, drive by ad hominems, the sign of a hollow argument, and perhaps a head in the same condition.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
BSM1
What? Me worry?
You're lucky, I don't have that much time left..
Stanyon
WWMRD?
.......And?
I've seen his posts too.
I say you're over-reaching on painting our friend as a defender of Trump's every action.
It's a bluff....a pretense....a false demonization.
Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Can you find an example where he hasn't obsequiously defended Trump either overtly or covertly?
Post #9 is one of many.
A vote against Trump is to not support him.
Criminy, even my vote for him was not to support him.
I see what you're up to here.
Trying to attack the poster, instead of the posts or the issues.
And he's somewhat guilty too, with the mirthful bit about
Trump living rent free in your mind. We'd all do well to stick
to the issues more, & each other less.
Stanyon
WWMRD?
Why is this important to you?
If you're proven to be a Trump supporting dirt bag,
then everything you post can be dismissed.
You're no longer a threat to the echo chamber.
Last edited:
shmogie
Well-Known Member
You are doing it wrong ! Knee deep ? Gads
tytlyf
Not Religious
What would you recommend to Libertarians that don't vote libertarian? And prefer to support (R) tickets over (L) ones?
shmogie
Well-Known Member
In the final analysis, don´t we vote for candidates and not party affiliation ? An R candidate might be a better candidate than an L candidate for a Libertarian for a whole host of reasons.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
To be fair @shmogie was partially right. There was talk about fraud, but that appears to be all that it was when investigated. And some did urge Nixon to challenge the election but he did turn them down:
"He told his friend, journalist Earl Mazo, that “our country cannot afford the agony of a constitutional crisis.” (Mazo had written a series of articles about voter fraud after the 1960 election, which he stopped at Nixon’s request.)"
The drama behind President Kennedy’s 1960 election win - National Constitution Center
This was perhaps the most decent thing that he did in his political career.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What do you think happened in Texas? Are you implying that there was widespread voter fraud? I have never heard of any substantiated charges.
tas8831
Well-Known Member
There never are - such charges, recent events show us, are primarily to divert attention form their own misdeeds. And by misdeeds I mean things like election fraud.