Conservative think tank:The Guardian is a leftist newpaper, and I don't trust "left" or "right" news. But, in specific they had printed fake news about Manafort meeting with Assange -- it never happened. God knows what else, that's just off the top of my head.
Eh, the human problem isn't the entirety of the problem -- it's the drugs, criminal elements, and whatnot that frequent the border. Then, comes the other question, is one human life worth 5 billion on a wall? To me, the money is worthless and a single American life is pretty important. I don't understand the nihilistic self-hate, or the voluntarily sacrifice of victims that could have never happened. To me, the wall is too tame -- sniper towers make more sense. But, that's because I believe if someone is breaking into your home you don't have to be nice to them. We're far too nice, we should be dicks.
Despite all of this, crossings are down 40% since Trump's election -- I wonder why, oh yeah, probably someone enforcing the damn laws. Using that as grounds to argue against the wall is pretty laughable to me. I'm aware of the number, and I'm also aware that it could be nearly zero if we used the tech, law enforcement, and techniques we have now at full efficiency. A wall is a basic investment that keeps workings for years, from that angle it makes a hell of a lot of sense.
New Cato Report: A Border Wall Won’t Stop Drug Smuggling—Marijuana Legalization Has
Conservative local newspaper from the largest stretch of border:
Texas smugglers say Trump's border wall wouldn't stop immigrants, drugs from pouring across the border
Ditto
https://www.mysanantonio.com/opinio...y-Trump-s-border-wall-won-t-work-13509623.php
And their reactions to state of emergency declaration.
Trump's border national emergency plan draws outrage and legal threats from some in Texas
El Paso groups to file lawsuit if Trump declares national emergency to build wall
There's also bipartisan views that this is and could lead to more abusing state of emergency function to bypass Congress and don't want to set the precedent because of Trump's bruised political ego, which is really what this is about.
When he said "I didn’t need to do this, but I’d rather do it much faster," I hope he knows those words will be thrown back at him in the court case.