Cooky
Veteran Member
I'd favor an aerial bombardment of an Iranian facility linked to its nuclear program, this bombing should be massive but limited to this specific target,"
That seems sensible.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd favor an aerial bombardment of an Iranian facility linked to its nuclear program, this bombing should be massive but limited to this specific target,"
Those I know from there & still there just want prosperity & peace.What do you think Iran wanted in Iran?
Those I know from there & still there just want prosperity & peace.
Ameristan seems dedicated to seeing they won't get it.
An unprovoked attack upon a country aspiring to nuclear weaponsThat seems sensible.
Don't ever presume that I do.Don't ever confuse the Iranian government with the Iranian people.
You're not alone in having Iranian connections.Two close friends from Iran who go home every year for 2 months are fearful of talking about the issues. They say, "In our family we NEVER discuss it".
Avoid making enemies? Are you mad? Damn you sir and your common sense. As a good Christian American I will partake of no such thing as common sense! Poppycock I say, sheer poppycock!An unprovoked attack upon a country aspiring to nuclear weapons
does have its risks. And they're more than just releasing radioactive
material into the environment. We've been attacking them for over half
a century, staging a coup, regime change, killing hundreds of thousands,
& devastating their economy.
I can think of no better way to incentivize their securing nuclear weapons
from either Russia, China or Pakistan. Nuclear capability is a clear means
to ensure we won't attack. The aforementioned countries know this.
So does N Korea. No matter their threats against us, Trump fetes their
dear leader. Why? Nukes. Our enemies learn from this.
So I advise eschewing making enemies in the first place.
It's surreal.Avoid making enemies? Are you mad? Damn you sir and your common sense. As a good Christian American I will partake of no such thing as common sense! Poppycock I say, sheer poppycock!
And why did they revolt?I am going to bed in a minute as I have a busy day tomorrow. I leave you in good faith to question WHY the Iran /Iraq war.
Causes - The Iran-Iraq War
https://iran-iraq.weebly.com/causes.html
Short Term Causes. Thus the Iranian Revolution weakened Iran to external forces but also replaced it with a regime that was perceived by Iraq to be more hostile than ever. Without the Iranian Revolution in 1979, the war would not have occurred the following year or likely at all.
It's exasperating. It's like they don't understand the price that we will keep on paying for decades if not centuries. A vicious cycle continues.It's surreal.
As I recall, I'm the only weapon system designer (former) on the forum.
Yet here I am arguing against using the very tools I've enabled.
I believe in peace & self defense, not in this insane desire to wage war.
I just don't understand war lust....the desire to kill without regard for others.
Hang on...so you are arguing that because Iraq (whose side the US was on as I recall) mistakenly shot up a US warship, it was perfectly in order for the US to respond by mistakenly shooting down an Iranian passenger aircraft? I declare I'm having trouble following the logic...as indeed I did at the time...and I think you also forgot to mention that the official reason for the error was that the Captain of the USS Vincennes believed he was being targetted by an Iranian F-14 Tomcat - I wonder where Iran might have got one of those from? Of course they didn't get one - they got 80 - courtesy of a deal between the Shah and Tricky Dicky. Of course these fell into the hands of the 'enemy' after the Revolution and they're still using them - most recently in Syria supporting Russian air strikes. So it isn't beyond the realms of possibility that after all this time, a US vessel might find itself on the wrong end of an F-14s weapons system for real.Background
In 1984, the war between Iraq and Iran had expanded to include air attacks against oil tankers and merchant shipping of neighboring countries, some of whom were providing aid to Iraq by shipping Iraqi oil. The Flight 655 incident occurred a year after the Iraqi Air Force attack on the U.S. Navy guided-missile frigate USS Stark on 17 May 1987
Trump just want to make better oil profits, Not the first time.We need to take whatever steps are necessary to deescalate this situation. The last thing we need is another earmed conflict in the Middle East.
How does this work?Trump just want to make better oil profits, Not the first time.
You know it might just be something more irrational and more visceral. It might just be plain human "bloodlust". Because none of this **** makes sense to me.Trump just want to make better oil profits, Not the first time.
We drop bombs. That's what we do. Now they want to provoke us? I say give them what they're essentially asking for.
Oil went 6 % up today. US produces slightly more than 50% of what it needs. It buys and sells oil, buy low sell high. They just tripped their oil imports from Russia, time to take profit.How does this work?
You salivate at the thought of kids killing kids.
Oh really, do you want to test that theory by going in yourself?I doubt a single American would die if we went to war with Iran. I don't think we should step a single foot on their land.
...We can do it from carriers via the sky.
Here are some problems with that claim....Oil went 6 % up today. US produces slightly more than 50% of what it needs. It buys and sells oil, buy low sell high. They just tripped their oil imports from Russia, time to take profit.
It always may be the case. Truth is they all love it: US, Russia, Iran, Iraq, SA.You know it might just be something more irrational and more visceral. It might just be plain human "bloodlust". Because none of this **** makes sense to me.