Just like everyone else on RF.
You have a problem with that?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump Indicted. To be Arrested in Days.
- Thread starter Windwalker
- Start date
You have a problem with that?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Or in Trump's own words "indicated" him.
Trump Rages at 'Thugs' Who 'INDICATED' Him
Donald Trump raged at the news that a Manhattan grand jury voted to indict him on charges related to a hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels.
www.rollingstone.com
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
I guess you chose to ignore the rest of my post. Quite telling.
I would say the way you phrased it can be "easily misread".The reason I say all that is because that wording is the way the right winger states it to suggest they found "nothing", when in fact that is not true. Considering I read it that way, because of that history, means its worth clarifying.
Something doesn't need to be stated explicitly, in order to be suggested. That is the meaning of the word connotation, or inferred, or implied, etc. Think of it like Trump saying likely saying "I never told them to storm the capital violently". Yet, all his other words clearly implied that they should. Words carry meaning beyond the words spoken, you know. I tend to be overly clear in my meanings, or at least try to be. Hence why my posts tend to be tomes.
It's your responsibility to be interesting enuf to inspire response.
Failure to do so is on you.
Last edited:
I often fail to take into account that posts clearly
stating something will be mis-read by those who
want to infer something else. This requires
a disclaimer to deny all the various agenda laden
inferences possible. Hard to anticipate when
that's needed.
Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
Bigly laff.Or in Trump's own words "indicated" him.
Trump Rages at 'Thugs' Who 'INDICATED' Him
Donald Trump raged at the news that a Manhattan grand jury voted to indict him on charges related to a hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels.
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
LOL....pointing out how you've been following the whataboutism script to a T just isn't "interesting" to you? Yeah right. Pretty weak sauce there Willy.
Geeze...way to entirely miss my advocating for Trump's prosecution.
Democratic apologists are indeed a narrowly focused bunch.
As I said. I will wait for the actual charges to come up.
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
Let's see....8 pages into the thread and you were still going on and on with "what about Obama and Clinton". Again, following the whataboutism script to a T.
Heyo
Veteran Member
Trying to move the goal posts. The claim, you said "won't happen", was that Trump gets indicted - and that happened.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Indictments do mean something. It means he's being brought to trial, whereas previously he believed he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and get away with it. Not anymore, Donald. That's why this means something. Now it's up to a jury of his peers. But all I can say is just wait for Georgia. To quote one of the grand jurists there who has seen all the evidence they have against the lot of them, "It's gonna be massive. It's gonna be massive."
No, he's not going to get away with this anymore. I don't believe that. Politicians can spew their spew all day, but in a court of law, facts matter.
And you'll be overjoyed to learn that Ron DeSantis has gratuitously stated that Florida would NOT cooperate in any effort to extradite Trump to New York if he decides not to turn himself in.
It probably feels good to you to know that this is a Governor thumbing his nose at the legal system in the United States. Will you be happy when all the laws are down?
In Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons, when Will Roper accuses Thomas More of respecting man's law over God's, and that he, Roper, would tear down the laws to get at the Devil, More responds:
“And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned around on you--where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast--man's laws, not God's--and if you cut them down...d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.”
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Steele did not say that this was some sort of "slam-dunk" but reported it to the CIA as a sort of heads-up.
BTW, before the Dems, the Pubs wanted to pay for his info, but that stopped once Trump got the nomination. Steele had a good reputation and had collaborated with our intelligence agencies on numerous occasions.
Christopher Steele - Wikipedia
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Ah, you're confusing some here with actual facts, so shame on you!
Heyo
Veteran Member
ptimistic:
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
I agree, all politicians should be prosecuted when they commit crimes.
I am not sure his other bigger crimes are being ignored, just that this investigation by these prosecutors beat the others to the punch, so to speak. I am sure more indictments will follow.