• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

True Religion

Saint Frankenstein

Gone
Premium Member
Overpriced jeans:

decae3ae94d318334df3ec7f2cd9ed2b.jpg
 

Deathbydefault

Apistevist Asexual Atheist
No such thing as a true religion.
There's no way currently to discern which on is true, assuming one was.
Even is there was a way, you have millions of religions and billions of god beliefs to sort through.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
If religion is nothing more than an aesthetic preference, then all the religions that put themselves forward as more than aesthetic preferences are wrong.

I don't see how that follows, but okay. Kind of a moot point though, since religion is never "nothing more than an aesthetic preference." It's culture, legacy, community, story, ritual... lots of things.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I don't see how that follows, but okay.

If you're saying that all religions are equally valid - or that any given religion might be valud for a particular person - then you're contradicting the idea that some religions are more valid than others, or the idea that some religions are just invalid, period, or the idea that there is only one religion that can properly be chosen. All of these ideas can be found in various religions.

By taking an inclusive approach to religion, you stand opposed to all the religions that demand an exclusive approach to religion.
Kind of a moot point though, since religion is never "nothing more than an aesthetic preference." It's culture, legacy, community, story, ritual... lots of things.
You made an analogy with a purely aesthetic preference.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
And this is the point when Jiddanand needs to clarify what he means by "religion," so we don't start talking past each other.
 
Top