• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trigger warning: Does 100% birth control exist?

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
BS
All competent adults can abstain. And abstinence is 100% effective.
But since lots of people don't want to abstain, there's a host other methods that hugely reduce the risk of pregnancy. If a dude wears a condom and his partner is on The Pill, the risk is reduced nearly to zero.

"Abstinence" isn't a policy. It's a Choice. "Abstinence only education" is a policy, one I consider ridiculously ineffective. Why do you keep bringing it up in response to me? I think it's just a strawman you resort to because what I am claiming is true, but doesn't support your agenda.
Tom
Nope, they can't. Humans have a very strong sex drive and most would fail at that eventually. Statistics support my claim. What supports your beliefs?
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Nope, they can't. Humans have a very strong sex drive and most would fail at that eventually. Statistics support my claim. What supports your beliefs?
Which belief?
That not having potentially fertile sex will result in not creating a baby?
Because that's the main thing I am claiming.
I agree with you about sex ed and PP. But I don't recall you agreeing that abstinence is 100% effective.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Nope. You need to be a realist. Most people cannot abstain. Abstinence is a pro-abortion policy.
Don't fall into the trap.
You 2 are arguing different meanings of efficacy, ie, a whole
population using it poorly vs the few who use it unfailingly.
You're just too mired down in pragmatism in the real world.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Don't fall into the trap.
You 2 are arguing different meanings of efficacy, ie, a whole
population using it poorly vs the few who use it unfailingly.
You're just too mired down in pragmatism in the real world.
The problem with that is it is a case of circular reasoning. A nonworking fix was offered. Even Catholic priests, a profession where one is supposedly celibate, cannot remain abstinent. How is the average Joe or Jolene supposed to do the same?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The problem with that is it is a case of circular reasoning. A nonworking fix was offered. Even Catholic priests, a profession where one is supposedly celibate, cannot remain abstinent. How is the average Joe or Jolene supposed to do the same?
Therein lies the problem....a perfect solution waiting for perfect people.
But it's not so universally useful to real people.
At least it's not as bad as another perfect solution....socialism.
 
Top