Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm less interested in the label 'religious' or 'irreligious' and more interested in what sort of behavior that entails.
I once knew a woman who said, "She is so heavenly minded that she's no earthly good".
It is certainly possible to take presumably religious beliefs too seriously for anyone's good.Is it possible to have too much religion and/or to be too religious? What do you think and why? If so what would that entail?
It is certainly possible to take presumably religious beliefs too seriously for anyone's good.
That is a major resource for deciding what should count as proper religion, IMO. How good, if at all, are its self-correction mechanisms?
Not faith at its best connotations, but to stubborn belief, certainly.Does the idea of a "self correction mechanisms" run contrary to "religious faith"?
Is it possible to have too much religion and/or to be too religious? What do you think and why? If so what would that entail?
Not faith at its best connotations, but to stubborn belief, certainly.
Much of its role is to destroy such belief outright.
If you believe something is received by a divine source, how can it be then that a mere human can correct it?
What do you think she meant by that?
Religion can mean pretty much anything which mean a wide variety of prescriptive or descriptive behaviors which could be helpful, harmful or neutral for individuals or societies. Since it's such a huge umbrella, it'd be hard to answer the question with any insightWhat entails?
Is it possible to have too much religion and/or to be too religious? What do you think and why? If so what would that entail?
Is it possible to have too much religion and/or to be too religious? What do you think and why? If so what would that entail?
Is it possible to have too much religion and/or to be too religious? What do you think and why? If so what would that entail?
Sorry, but I don't feel it is needed or even worthwhile to try and define something like religion. Just pay attention to what the context around the word means and ask for clarification when needed.Religion can mean pretty much anything which mean a wide variety of prescriptive or descriptive behaviors which could be helpful, harmful or neutral for individuals or societies. Since it's such a huge umbrella, it'd be hard to answer the question with any insight
Is that always a bad thing? Aren't some ideas worth dying for?It is possible to take any ideology -- religious or otherwise -- to an inhumane extreme. That happens whenever one elevates the ideology to make it more important than flesh and blood, more important than people. You can do that with any ideology, and it is always stupid and immoral.
What does that mean?Faith is life.
Regards Tony
Why should I need to ask a theist? Is there something about "religious faith" that an atheist (or other non-believer) cannot understand?You would have to ask that to a theist, which I am not. I would never do or advise anyone to do such a thing as trust divine sources. That would be quite unwise, pointless, silly at the very least.
IMO it is instead for humans to validate the divine and decide whether it is a fair representation of the sacred, on a case-by-case basis... if they decide that dealing with god-concepts is worth the trouble at all, which is definitely not a given.