To those who do not believe in spiritual beings (Gods, Buddhas and so on)

[Audie]

After you - ladies first.

May it be that you are just not able to see or hear the supernatural beings that are called Gods, Buddhas, and so on? Maybe you just look at it the wrong way? or your spiritual vision is not tuned to the right frequency? Would it be possible for you to explain what you expect to see or hear to get your proof of an existence of God or other spiritual beings?

-that taere are "supernatural beings" or anything at all supernatural
-that others bother to look for them
-that there is or could be a right way to look
-that there is "spiritual vision" or a frequency
-that there is some "expectation"
-that there could be proof.

Followed by the assumption that questions do not involve
assumptions.

Our hero of the op seems to have me on ig, you will
have to get on his frequency yourself.

 

[Audie]

As others have pointed out, perhaps it is not the atheists and agnostics who have any weaknesses but those more ready to believe so readily.

Weakness for sure.
It takes a very dedicated "believer" to think the arctic is littered
with millions of flash frozen mammoths that were killed int he
flood.

My personal fav, tho, is the one who told me that there is no
flood evidence (he should talk this over with the mammoth guy)
because god cleaned it all up, and, sent the excess water to
Neptune where it shines to this day as a warning beacon,
against incoming rogue angels.

This spiritual sense is not really a plus.

 

[Mock Turtle]

May it be that you are just not able to see or hear the supernatural beings that are called Gods, Buddhas, and so on? Maybe you just look at it the wrong way? or your spiritual vision is not tuned to the right frequency? Would it be possible for you to explain what you expect to see or hear to get your proof of an existence of God or other spiritual beings?

-that taere are "supernatural beings" or anything at all supernatural
-that others bother to look for them
-that there is or could be a right way to look
-that there is "spiritual vision" or a frequency
-that there is some "expectation"
-that there could be proof.

Followed by the assumption that questions do not involve
assumptions.

Our hero of the op seems to have me on ig, you will
have to get on his frequency yourself.

Ignoring is the cowards way out. Not something I would do. In case one might have missed this - here is what @Audie commented as being assumptions:

-that there are "supernatural beings" or anything at all supernatural
-that others bother to look for them
-that there is or could be a right way to look
-that there is "spiritual vision" or a frequency
-that there is some "expectation"
-that there could be proof.

 

[Audie]

Ignoring is the cowards way out. Not something I would do. In case one might have missed this - here is what @Audie commented as being assumptions:

-that there are "supernatural beings" or anything at all supernatural
-that others bother to look for them
-that there is or could be a right way to look
-that there is "spiritual vision" or a frequency
-that there is some "expectation"
-that there could be proof.

I dont think I am cowardly in who I put on ig.
Some here are so odious that i feel dirty seeing
their posts.

 

[Mock Turtle]

I dont think I am cowardly in who I put on ig.
Some here are so odious that i feel dirty seeing
their posts.

I don't know, perhaps I just don't care enough to honour them with an ignore - I usually just don't reply to them.

 

[Mock Turtle]

Weakness for sure.
It takes a very dedicated "believer" to think the arctic is littered
with millions of flash frozen mammoths that were killed int he
flood.

My personal fav, tho, is the one who told me that there is no
flood evidence (he should talk this over with the mammoth guy)
because god cleaned it all up, and, sent the excess water to
Neptune where it shines to this day as a warning beacon,
against incoming rogue angels.

This spiritual sense is not really a plus.

The road to ruin when one starts to dismiss scientific evidence over some religious nonsense.