• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

To be or not to be. That is the question!

questfortruth

Well-Known Member

Vast amount of evidence is found that there is the Law of optimization of
reality: the Law of Beauty. According to this, a complicated problem can
find the simplest solution. All essential tasks are expected to be solved in finite
time using mind-power [an example is AI implication in research] because
one can have a beautiful mind. This is a reminder of the film "A Beautiful
Mind'' about Dr. John Nash.

Hence, the necessary condition for a perfectly beautiful person is the highest
Intellectual Coefficient (IQ) score. Such a person would know all hidden so far
knowledge. Including then the fact of own presence: you cannot be All-knowing
without self-awareness. Hence, the knowledge of the presence of All-knowing
Beauty is among the hidden so far knowledge.

Verb "to be'' should have two distinct meanings: 1. to be existent, 2. to be present.
For example, Sherlock Holmes exists in the fantasy realm but is not present in
the actual world.

Non-existent item B does not exist. And that sentence seems to make the B existent
because there is either existent B or non-existent B. To avoid that contradiction,
one writes: ``non-present item B is not present.'' Hence, the verb "to be present'' is
undeniable and pragmatic, but "to be existent'' is not easily verifiable fact.

 
Last edited:
Top