Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
I wonder, inspiration from the god-prayer thread: Therapist ideally aren't allowed to judge their clients. Their clients can say whatever and however they want as long as there is no direct intention to harm oneself or harm someone else. Anything goes as long as the therapist knows it's in context.
For some reason, god judges prayers by how often one does it, intervals, what one can and can't say, where one is when they pray, and so forth.
If god is the first person of contact when dealing with emotional matters, wouldn't one go to god with anything without rules and regulations and therapists be the ones who have restrictions to what is said and not said?
In other words, shouldn't it be the other way around?
In therapy, in context you can say I want to kill my mother and go out of the room fine. However, if you said it to god, there is a guilt feeling that one has disobeyed god and maybe needs to repent. Why is god different in those regards?
Mind you, the questions are just about the same just phased differently for clarity (for all my posts on RF).
For some reason, god judges prayers by how often one does it, intervals, what one can and can't say, where one is when they pray, and so forth.
If god is the first person of contact when dealing with emotional matters, wouldn't one go to god with anything without rules and regulations and therapists be the ones who have restrictions to what is said and not said?
In other words, shouldn't it be the other way around?
In therapy, in context you can say I want to kill my mother and go out of the room fine. However, if you said it to god, there is a guilt feeling that one has disobeyed god and maybe needs to repent. Why is god different in those regards?
Mind you, the questions are just about the same just phased differently for clarity (for all my posts on RF).
Last edited: