I submit that the likeliest mechanism which could have led to the kind of (quantum-atomic) world we have now had to involve some type of universal oscillation. The only likely substrate for such an oscillation would have been original space. Inasmuch as original space would have been free of any kind of forces,, it would have differed from space as it now exists. Original space could well have been more self-compatible than space is now. It's impossible to exactly know the nature of original space, but we can't just assume it was a simple void. The oscillating point-localities of original space would have required tiny "empty" portions of space between them to allow for oscillatory motions to occur. -This "oscillatory" concept of original space leads to a further concept that massless, elemental, universal, point-localities of space were what "came first."
The next step would have been transitional, from oscillating point-like elements, to vibrating, elemental, "ether" units, as follows: Oscillatory fatigue of neighboring "points" would have produced combinational "Yin Yang" paired-up units, which then, inasmuch as they would necessarily have had to reversibly revert to singleton units, would then have fallen out-of-phase with the oscillations in space. This would have broken the perfect symmetry of oscillational space. (Oscillatory fatigue is a process known to science. It occurs in metals.) Thus, the point-like elements of space would have transitioned, from reciprocally-oscillating-in-balance units, to vibrating, interactive (as their outward vibrations came into contact with each other across the tiny"empty" portions of space between them) elemental "ether" units. These would have constituted a universal etheric matrix, whose elemental units would have served as the fundamental building blocks for everything from then on. The next step after that would have been that these elemental units would have served as the basis for a transition to our structured quantum-atomic world - for which I don't see any other possibility than creational design, using the ultra-refined etheric units to move the much-larger quantum units around, via designed "like-unit" pathways, or channels, coursing through the ether matrix.
You need creational input, for just one example, to account for how antiparticles could have found channels out-of-the-way-of the new quantum-particle universe. It seems likely that the repository for the antiparticles would have been black holes. -This amounts to a first-ever way to rationally explain the absence of antiparticles, and the presence of black holes, in the universe. -Also, this picture, of an unstructured ether matrix composed of interactive vibrating elemental units, existing together with a structured quantum/atomic world whose fundamental building blocks are those same ether units, represents the only rational way to account for Quantum Entanglement.
This kind of model also provides a new concept of gravity, as being due to contraction of the ether between two solid bodies. The ether units inside the two bodies, being elemental, are identical to the ether units in the space just outside the bodies (we could call this the "auric" space between the bodies.). However, the ether units inside the bodies are at a higher energy level than the spatial ether units, meaning their vibratory interaction is increased, compared to the spatial ether units. But as the elemental units at the surface of the bodies come into contact with the elemental units in the adjacent space, the spatial units become more energized, meaning the tiny "empty" portions of space between them becomes erased. The net effect is that overall, the ether between the two bodies contracts, which pulls the two bodies toward each other gravitationally.
I submit that this kind of model makes much more common sense than the present models that are based entirely on quantum theory.
The next step would have been transitional, from oscillating point-like elements, to vibrating, elemental, "ether" units, as follows: Oscillatory fatigue of neighboring "points" would have produced combinational "Yin Yang" paired-up units, which then, inasmuch as they would necessarily have had to reversibly revert to singleton units, would then have fallen out-of-phase with the oscillations in space. This would have broken the perfect symmetry of oscillational space. (Oscillatory fatigue is a process known to science. It occurs in metals.) Thus, the point-like elements of space would have transitioned, from reciprocally-oscillating-in-balance units, to vibrating, interactive (as their outward vibrations came into contact with each other across the tiny"empty" portions of space between them) elemental "ether" units. These would have constituted a universal etheric matrix, whose elemental units would have served as the fundamental building blocks for everything from then on. The next step after that would have been that these elemental units would have served as the basis for a transition to our structured quantum-atomic world - for which I don't see any other possibility than creational design, using the ultra-refined etheric units to move the much-larger quantum units around, via designed "like-unit" pathways, or channels, coursing through the ether matrix.
You need creational input, for just one example, to account for how antiparticles could have found channels out-of-the-way-of the new quantum-particle universe. It seems likely that the repository for the antiparticles would have been black holes. -This amounts to a first-ever way to rationally explain the absence of antiparticles, and the presence of black holes, in the universe. -Also, this picture, of an unstructured ether matrix composed of interactive vibrating elemental units, existing together with a structured quantum/atomic world whose fundamental building blocks are those same ether units, represents the only rational way to account for Quantum Entanglement.
This kind of model also provides a new concept of gravity, as being due to contraction of the ether between two solid bodies. The ether units inside the two bodies, being elemental, are identical to the ether units in the space just outside the bodies (we could call this the "auric" space between the bodies.). However, the ether units inside the bodies are at a higher energy level than the spatial ether units, meaning their vibratory interaction is increased, compared to the spatial ether units. But as the elemental units at the surface of the bodies come into contact with the elemental units in the adjacent space, the spatial units become more energized, meaning the tiny "empty" portions of space between them becomes erased. The net effect is that overall, the ether between the two bodies contracts, which pulls the two bodies toward each other gravitationally.
I submit that this kind of model makes much more common sense than the present models that are based entirely on quantum theory.
