• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Unitarian Problem

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
What error? The error men made in not placing their faith in God?

All scripture is inspired of God and reveals the truth of God. The truth of God is, IMO, the Holy One, the Saviour Jesus Christ. If you cannot see Christ in the story of Noah then maybe you should look again. Is it based on a real flood, and did Noah and his family exist? Yes, I believe so. Do you have evidence to prove that a flood did not occur, or that Noah did not exist?

There may have been a local inundation that the story tellers based Noah and the flood on, but at this distance it is impossible to prove one way or the other, but it is clearly largely religious fable.

However like most such stories in the Bible it can be used as a useful basis for teaching ethics and about Faith in God.
 

Redemptionsong

Well-Known Member
I would not rely too much on Revelation.
It only scraped into the Bible on the third attempt.
It is a bit like finding religious truth from the pen of Ron Hubbard.
Any similarity to the truth is pure chance.

That's where the unity of scripture becomes important. The book of Revelation contains extracts and references to many other books of the Bible. It has a special relationship with the book of Genesis. Once you begin to unravel the tapestry of scripture, you end up having no scripture at all. That position of absolute atheism is difficult to maintain.

This is why Jesus' statement, 'scripture cannot be broken', is so true and powerful.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
That's where the unity of scripture becomes important. The book of Revelation contains extracts and references to many other books of the Bible. It has a special relationship with the book of Genesis. Once you begin to unravel the tapestry of scripture, you end up having no scripture at all. That position of absolute atheism is difficult to maintain.

This is why Jesus' statement, 'scripture cannot be broken', is so true and powerful.


As long as you see scripture as a mix of fable, folk law. history, reminisces, speculation and ancient laws.
it is both interesting and useful.
It is contains probably the best record of the teachings of Jesus that remain to us. but it is difficulty to separate the fact from the fiction, and from the misremembered. but it is almost all we have.....
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
What error? The error men made in not placing their faith in God?

All scripture is inspired of God and reveals the truth of God. The truth of God is, IMO, the Holy One, the Saviour Jesus Christ. If you cannot see Christ in the story of Noah then maybe you should look again. Is it based on a real flood, and did Noah and his family exist? Yes, I believe so. Do you have evidence to prove that a flood did not occur, or that Noah did not exist?

There is overwhelming geologic evidence that no such flood occurred in recent geologic history where the flood covered the mountains on a regional flood or world flood. I am a geologist/geomorphologist/soil scientist of over fifty years, and I have been around the world studying geology.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
You're speaking the language of the twenty-first century. Isaiah was speaking 700 years before the birth of Christ, and he gives the perspective of a man surveying his horizons. There is absolutely no indication from the Bible that people thought the earth was flat!
You would think God would know the right word.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
What error? The error men made in not placing their faith in God?

All scripture is inspired of God and reveals the truth of God. The truth of God is, IMO, the Holy One, the Saviour Jesus Christ. If you cannot see Christ in the story of Noah then maybe you should look again. Is it based on a real flood, and did Noah and his family exist? Yes, I believe so. Do you have evidence to prove that a flood did not occur, or that Noah did not exist?

More to the point, there is no evidence at all that there was a flood or that Noah is other than a fable.
Neither has any bearing on the Exitance of God.

However I do not doubt that the story was based on a local flood or one that was still relevant to the teller of the original story.
It must be remembered that the that the old testament stories were not written down till after the Jewish diaspora and the second Temple. Prior to that it was an oral tradition. Where there were two versions of a story both were written down, which is evident in the variations in the Torah attributed to Moses. They represent the different verbal traditions of The Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah, that were used to provide the final written texts, as we know them today.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Back to the Unitarian problem and whether they may call themselves as Christians. There are many diverse and conflicting beliefs among Christians, and some consider you not a Christian. There are many other churches and millions of believers that call themselves Christians that do not believe as you do. Can they call themselves Christians?
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Back to the Unitarian problem and whether they may call themselves as Christians. There are many diverse and conflicting beliefs among Christians, and some consider you not a Christian. There are many other churches and millions of believers that call themselves Christians that do not believe as you do. Can they call themselves Christians?

Few Christian churches consider Unitarians to be Christians.
Some unitarians Consider them selves to be Christian
though none are Trinitarians.

Most of the early church were not Trinitarians it had not been invented yet.
Most of the early church did not think Jesus was God, Like himself they called him a son of God. They like him and as he taught, worshiped God.

The principal non trinitarian Churches are the Unitarians, Non subscribing Presbyterians, Jehova witnesses, and the Latter Day Saints... all of which are considered heretical by Trinitarian Churches.

No one holds Copyright to the term Christian. A unitarian would consider it to mean a follower of Christ and his teachings.

A modern form of Unitarinism The UU do not consider themselves Christian but they do have Christian members.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Why not just worship God? If Jesus is God, you are already covered. If he isn’t, God should be primary anyway. Win-win.
Jesus isn't the God that some people think of him as. Make of it as some people will, he still said no matter what, the Father is greater than he is. John 14:28 - "You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am." Did he say the Father is equal to me? No, he didn't. He said the Father is greater than he is. Just to say...
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Few Christian churches consider Unitarians to be Christians.
Some unitarians Consider them selves to be Christian
though none are Trinitarians.

Most of the early church were not Trinitarians it had not been invented yet.
Most of the early church did not think Jesus was God, Like himself they called him a son of God. They like him and as he taught, worshiped God.

The principal non trinitarian Churches are the Unitarians, Non subscribing Presbyterians, Jehova witnesses, and the Latter Day Saints... all of which are considered heretical by Trinitarian Churches.

No one holds Copyright to the term Christian. A unitarian would consider it to mean a follower of Christ and his teachings.

A modern form of Unitarinism The UU do not consider themselves Christian but they do have Christian members.
Yes, I like the way you say the Trinity had not been invented yet by the early church.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Few Christian churches consider Unitarians to be Christians.
Some unitarians Consider them selves to be Christian
though none are Trinitarians.

Most of the early church were not Trinitarians it had not been invented yet.
Most of the early church did not think Jesus was God, Like himself they called him a son of God. They like him and as he taught, worshiped God.

The principal non trinitarian Churches are the Unitarians, Non subscribing Presbyterians, Jehova witnesses, and the Latter Day Saints... all of which are considered heretical by Trinitarian Churches.

No one holds Copyright to the term Christian. A unitarian would consider it to mean a follower of Christ and his teachings.

A modern form of Unitarinism The UU do not consider themselves Christian but they do have Christian members.
Now it might be a good time for you to explain what you think a Christian is. Thank you.
 
Top