The evidence lies in the following.
1. The contextual nature of language and everything linguistics tell us, should not allow to even assume these evil meanings with respect to Quran just by language itself.
2. The more natural reading according to language norms and linguistics is not preferred by majority of believers of the Quran, tells us something is going wrong.
3. The more natural reading is also not even seen as a mere possibility by the majority of believers. (this is one the greatest proofs that it's unnatural curse)
4. The difficulty in accepting the more natural and right meanings with majority after clarification, shows, there is something even more deeper still, and the curse is hard to let go. That is even with clarification, it seems the curse makes it appear unlikely and that the cursed meaning is more likely.
I am giving examples of this in another thread. But I failed to elaborate these four points. And I will give examples with these fours points in mind and prove the four happen.
1. The contextual nature of language and everything linguistics tell us, should not allow to even assume these evil meanings with respect to Quran just by language itself.
2. The more natural reading according to language norms and linguistics is not preferred by majority of believers of the Quran, tells us something is going wrong.
3. The more natural reading is also not even seen as a mere possibility by the majority of believers. (this is one the greatest proofs that it's unnatural curse)
4. The difficulty in accepting the more natural and right meanings with majority after clarification, shows, there is something even more deeper still, and the curse is hard to let go. That is even with clarification, it seems the curse makes it appear unlikely and that the cursed meaning is more likely.
I am giving examples of this in another thread. But I failed to elaborate these four points. And I will give examples with these fours points in mind and prove the four happen.