I happened to watch a movie yesterday about "The Spirits Book".
The Spirits Book - Wikipedia
I though it fictional story and was watching for interest until in the movie I heard that the source was the 'Spirit of Truth'. So I thought I would look it up.
It was a book published in 1857.
From what I understand as to what Baha'u'llah has offered, that when a New Message is given by God, its proclamation to all humanity comes from many various sources, by many various paths of inspiration. All those paths reflect the light to the extent they are free of material influence, but the Source is the Messenger, even before they are known in this world. Much like the rays of the sun are seen before it dawns on the horizon.
So some aspects of the doctrine contained in the book are:
It never ceases to amaze me how much spiritual outpouring there was in the 1800's and I see Allan Kardec and persons such as William Miller were indeed tapped into a source they could not fully understand.
This is the Netflix movie
https://www.netflix.com/au/title/80997400?preventIntent=true
This is posted in the debate section as I think general discussion would be difficult on RF, given the diversity of thought here.
So the question of the debate is.
Is there any truth in this book?
Regards Tony
The Spirits Book - Wikipedia
I though it fictional story and was watching for interest until in the movie I heard that the source was the 'Spirit of Truth'. So I thought I would look it up.
It was a book published in 1857.
From what I understand as to what Baha'u'llah has offered, that when a New Message is given by God, its proclamation to all humanity comes from many various sources, by many various paths of inspiration. All those paths reflect the light to the extent they are free of material influence, but the Source is the Messenger, even before they are known in this world. Much like the rays of the sun are seen before it dawns on the horizon.
So some aspects of the doctrine contained in the book are:
- Man is a Spirit with a material body, i.e. our truer selves are not material, but spiritual.
- A living person is made of three entities: the spirit, the body and the spiritual body (the perispirit) that binds both. The perispirit is an original word of Spiritism.
- Spirits pre-exist and will survive matter that was created.
- There are not angels or demons as separate orders in the creation, but only good and evil spirits. Even a beastly person will eventually attain perfection.
- All Spirits are created simple and ignorant. They gradually evolve intellectually and morally, so passing from an inferior order to more elevated ones until finally reaching perfection.
- All Spirits preserve their individuality, before, during and after each life (incarnation). However, the amount of memory one retains depends on one's level of spiritual progression.
- The different corporeal existences of the Spirit are progressive and not regressive. The pace of their progress, however, depends on the effort made towards betterment. Spirits can stagnate for so long that it seems to be an eternity and it can even appear that they have retrograded.
- Spirits pertain to various orders, according to the degree of perfection they have attained, in three major categories (with fluid limits and unknown number of subcategories): Pure Spirits, who have attained maximum perfection; Good Spirits, whose desire towards goodness predominates, and Imperfect Spirits, who are characterized by ignorance and evil impulses. The relationship of Spirits with Man is constant and has always existed. The Good Spirits do their best to lead us towards goodness and uphold us during our trials, helping us to support them with courage and resignation. By contrast, the Imperfect Spirits try to incite us toward evil.
- Everyone has their own spirit-protector, otherwise known as a guardian angel, who is entrusted with keeping watch over somebody as a mission or trial for them. Similarly to our incarnation on the earth, this mission for them can be a way of advancing and purifying themselves.
- Jesus is the guide and model for mankind. The Doctrine which he taught and exemplified is the most pure expression of God's Laws. However, most of the traditional doctrine on him being the Christ (Messiah) is seen under a different light. Aspects regarded as keystones of faith by most denominations, like trinitarianism and the virgin birth are not seen as important, while his resurrection is explained in another way. His death also has a different interpretation: instead of a sacrifice to atone for our sins, it is an example of the importance of being coherent and resisting temptation.
- Man has free will, but must face the consequences of his deeds.
- The future life is in accordance to one's behavior and learning needs.
It never ceases to amaze me how much spiritual outpouring there was in the 1800's and I see Allan Kardec and persons such as William Miller were indeed tapped into a source they could not fully understand.
This is the Netflix movie
https://www.netflix.com/au/title/80997400?preventIntent=true
This is posted in the debate section as I think general discussion would be difficult on RF, given the diversity of thought here.
So the question of the debate is.
Is there any truth in this book?
Regards Tony
Last edited: