Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So I was just discussing with someone on the forums about the JW view of the rape of Dinah.
And I wanted to know what is the Jewish understanding of the rape of Dinah, what is the significance of the story?
Perhaps there was no rape. We should ask Dinah but, sadly, she has no voice ... and that is significant.
So I was just discussing with someone on the forums about the JW view of the rape of Dinah.
And I wanted to know what is the Jewish understanding of the rape of Dinah, what is the significance of the story?
I am not sure what you are looking for, but here is an analysis.
The family of Ya'akov enters the city of Sh'khem and Dinah, the one sister among eleven brothers, is forcibly taken by Sh'khem, the prince of the city-state after which he is named. Sh'khem rapes her and, ... [ibid]
So I was just discussing with someone on the forums about the JW view of the rape of Dinah.
And I wanted to know what is the Jewish understanding of the rape of Dinah, what is the significance of the story?
So, for example, here.I'm not sure what you're asking. Do you mean, did Simeon and Levi over-react?
That is but one analysis and, I suspect, not a particularly good one.
Perhaps. What do you consider to be the fairly strong support?I'm not sure it's fair to simply dismiss it as substandard, when there are some fairly strong supports for that reading in both pshat and tradition.
I'm not sure what you're asking. Do you mean, did Simeon and Levi over-react?
I agree that the particular drash of the text you mentioned-- that perhaps it was not rape but consensual and thus wholly undeserving of the following retribution-- is a perfectly valid reading. But so is the reading that it was rape, and not consensual at all. I'm not sure it's fair to simply dismiss it as substandard, when there are some fairly strong supports for that reading in both pshat and tradition.
The JW view is that it is a moral story illustrating "bad association," that Dinah was raped for associating with loose women who were not Gods people and that sexual exploitation can be avoided by associating only with those who uphold Gods high standards.
What is the significance of the story for you?
The question is regarding the brothers reaction to the rape.
Parashat Vayishlach - Torah.orgSo you think the significance of the story is how Dinah's brothers reacted to her being raped, is that what you mean? And what is the lesson behind how they reacted?
Unless, of course, it does not.Not really since it says he took/ raped her.
Yes, I do, but I'm just beginning to look into it anew and I'm very much a novice at such things. I suspect that it will be a while before I'm fully comfortable with a position.Thanks for this. Do you think the language used, points more towards that she was not raped?
Not really since it says he took/ raped her.
Perhaps. What do you consider to be the fairly strong support?