Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
Is it not? I haven't read it since I was in high school (back in the 90's.)
I haven't read that far yet, considering you haven't either in a hundred years.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is it not? I haven't read it since I was in high school (back in the 90's.)
I have been. I'm influenced by it and consider Satan a useful archetype.
It'd be more accurate to say, they come up with their own standards. But, they'd generally agree that being obsessed, psychotic, or completely oblivious to the needs of others around them is not really in line with Satanic philosophy. Generally, the point of Satanism is to be in the drivers seat in your life -- it's not to be a socially awkward or careless, sex-addicted, weak, drug addict, or a ninny.
It's about freedom, but both ways -- for the others, not just you. Anything else is hypocrisy, really. Satanism in any manifestation rejects harming people who are doing you no harm, it just doesn't have a problem if you decide to retaliate on those whom have harmed you.
A Satanist also is aware more laws are designed to protect the innocent from the mental patients, lol. If a Satanist has a problem with a law, they're going to do what anyone else does on the issue -- petition their representatives, lobby, and do the normal thing any other citizen does. They're not going to go "**** that" and just do what they want. Most of the freedom a Satanist seeks is in their own dealings and head-space.
@Epic Beard Man
His ignore is about my dispute with him on issues in relation to transgender politics. Nothing about my discussions of Satanism. Frankie is religiously-fluid, so I'd take his perspective with a grain of salt -- just as I would any person that is pretty eclectic in such manner.
Anyway, I have about ten years of posting on this forum about Satanism and it's various caveats. If the search function here worked a bit better I'd probably refer you to that. I've been a Satanist for 28 years, longer than most of the people around here are probably living. I've been speaking and writing on the subject since I was about 18, have published work, done various podcasts, and related. I generally don't talk about that much because I have no need to impress myself or others with that. But, for the sake of knowledge I'd just say that I'm balls deep in the subject and have no problem helping people get truthful information.
Also, there is a huge forum on Order of the Serpent, which is really a sister-site to this (it was founded by RF's LHP community, basically), and many of the discussions carry more depth than would be suitable for general admission sites like this. Anyway, if you're truly looking for detail information that's probably a better place to go and ask.
It isn't??? Heck.....no wonder I had a hard time keeping girlfriends!
During my days off from work I decided to indulge my intellect in purchasing the "Satanic Bible" for purposes of understanding the basic tenants of Satanism. I will just say that my prior knowledge of Satanism derived from my earlier teachings as a Baptist Christian. It's taught that Satanism is demonic, devil worshipping, cat sacrificing religion filled with people who use black lipstick bad hair cuts, black boots and women wearing fish net stockings chanting "Hail Satan!" Fast forward to now my understanding of Satanism is a lot more liberal and undefiled by fundamental Christian stereotypes. Through brief readings I can say I understand a little bit better what Satanism stands for, of course Laveyan Satanism, considering that I am aware there are other schisms in Satanism so to speak, however some Satanists will argue there is no such thing as a schism in Satanism.
I concede that I'm still ignorant of the religion of Satanism and therefore subject to being wrong, however philosophically thus far my impression of Satanism is liken to anarchists who are against the commercialization of religion and its presupposed diabolical influences to constrain mankind's pleasures. It is those constraints that keep mankind from self-realization and fully enjoying the worldly pleasures which Satan as the archetype represents. What was peculiar to me while reading the prologue I took an interest to the nine Satanic statements:
Interesting enough I believe the aforementioned would represent what I thought of earlier concerning the model of anti-religion through "religious anarchy." I believe these nine statements would be any person with grandiose thoughts of the self and self-indulgent, wet dream. The problem that I have is that there are no limitations to behavior, and that sensible indulgence is left unchecked on an animal (man) who left without lawful decree, can be dangerous. the problem that I'm seeing thus far is that this doctrine is creating a foundation of selfish hedonism which more often than not, can potentially lead into a destructive lifestyle.
- Satan represents indulgence, instead of abstinence!
- Satan represents vital existence, instead of spiritual pipe dreams!
- Satan represents undefiled wisdom, instead of hypocritical self-deceit!
- Satan represents kindness to those who deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates!
- Satan represents vengeance, instead of turning the other cheek!
- Satan represents responsibility to the responsible, instead of concern for psychic vampires!
- Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all!
- Satan represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification!
- Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years!
You are correct. I can't imagine why churches would vilify a religion promoting self, vengeance and sinful indulgence.
You are correct. I can't imagine why churches would vilify a religion promoting self, vengeance and sinful indulgence.
The term Satanism was first used by people who considered Satan an image to aspire to, but were atheists or agnostics. LaVey was the best-known exponent of that "symbolic Satanism". Related is the Satanic Temple, a group of US atheists who are registered as a religious body for legal reasons.My next question is what is "theistic Satanism?"
Not all of it is. That's a LaVeyan thing, really, because that was a backlash to transcendent "flesh vs. spirit" paradigms. It's atheistic and physicalist, so they believe in indulging their carnal desires. They view Satan as a mascot for humanity's primal instincts, a sort of deific animal force in nature. A life force, if you will. At least that's how LaVey wrote about it.Okay. Considering humans are socially altruistic, why is Satanism hedonistic?
My next question is what is "theistic Satanism?" I've did further research on YouTube and there is a guy who believes in conjuring up actual demons and the devil himself. What I don't understand is considering the history of conjuring ancient beings like Succubus, and imps or what not that were historically considered malevolent, why do people in these arts do this? Although I seek to be in God's light, I find these dark things very intriguing almost mesmerizing.
I haven't read that far yet, considering you haven't either in a hundred years.
Haven't historically, and currently Christians have done the same thing? Can't throw stones at glass houses.
Born again Christians promote sinful self-indulgence and vengeance?!
Oh we born again now?
Yes. Typical Christians who are holier than thou do in fact commit sin through self indulgence. Let’s take for example the Christian who spoke on “conversion therapy” that is, to convert homosexuals to be heterosexual himself comes out as gay.
Prominent ‘gay conversion therapist’ comes out as gay
I find many Christians hypocritical in their beliefs regarding other people.
Yes. Vengeance, as when he cursed the people of Capernaum for not listening to him. (Matt. 11.23). Self-indulgence, perhaps in the case of the Gadarene swine? A farmer's livestock destroyed to demonstrate his healing powers, to say nothing of the cruelty to animals.Born again Christians PROMOTE sinful self-indulgence and vengeance? Do you feel our Lord, Jesus, promoted these things in the Bible?!
Yes. Vengeance, as when he cursed the people of Capernaum for not listening to him. (Matt. 11.23). Self-indulgence, perhaps in the case of the Gadarene swine? A farmer's livestock destroyed to demonstrate his healing powers, to say nothing of the cruelty to animals.
You asked if Jesus promoted bad behaviour. I said "yes". How is that saying he was a "follower of himself"?So Jesus Christ is now a follower of Himself, a "Christian"?!
Well, at least we agree on something! But that's one reason why I cannot accept that Yahweh is "God".God is a God of vengeance…
No, they were obviously owned by a gentile, for whom Jesus showed no charity or respect.Do you think the Gadarene swine were herded by Jews in defiance of the Law?
He showed he loved the Jew he healed more than the gentile whose livelihood he destroyed. I think they were very restrained: they might have thrown him off the cliff. He also showed that he loved demons more than pigs!Are you like the Gadarenes, begging Jesus to leave you alone, AFTER HE HEALED THE POOR DEMONIAC, showing God loves people more than swine…?!
No. You obviously know according to the Qur'an, Satanists are as misguided as Jews and Christians.