God can’t allow for evil to exist and be omnipotent, all benevolent, and omniscient. But, the problem of evil doesn’t deny the belief in and the patience for a messiah, and Elohim created our moment of pain we let be to create the angels of Wraith. Basically God wouldn’t let wrath suffer alone, and did not damn him to heck, and honored his nature to not be inhumane by keeping a human nature dormant. Thoughts?
We need to go back to the story of Adam and Eve, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil to understand the source of evil. Knowledge of good and evil is what defines good and evil. For example, CO2 was not always an evil greenhouse gas, until the fear mongers defined it as evil. In the blink of an eye, a molecule became evil. Before Adam and Eve ate from that tree and learned to define good and evil, evil did not exist. There was nothing in paradise that was displayed as evil or scary. Paradise was very peaceful and loving.
God said, if you eat from this tree you shall surely die. That was the warning of the evil that would come from a type of learned knowledge; good and evil. But Satan said if you eat from the tree, you will be like God, knowing good from evil. This crossroads is when evil appeared. Eating from the tree symbolized learning; eaten this unique food for thought.
What Satan was selling was not morality, but relative morality. It was not the divine morality that was built into human nature and instinct before the fall. God knew if Adam and Eve chose relative morality, this would lead to pain, suffering, and conflict, since people will assume what is good for themselves, is also good for all. If a ruthless dictator thinks it is good to torture and kill his enemies, via his own code of relative morality, then evil will come to his nation, posing as the leader's relative good. Many citizens will help round up his critics, since this is good. To get along in culture, and not be a target, you may need to stand on your head.
Relative morality creates more than one set of rules, which will then create conflict, since everyone is not on the same page. Picture playing a sport where everyone makes up their own rules. There will be arguments and fights with people getting hurt due to conflicting rules, where each person is trying to stack the deck for themselves to win. This is where evil came from; human will and choice. The street thug who robs people with a gun is doing good by his own rules of relative morality; he is making money. The vigilante who seeks out such people for extermination, is also doing good by his own relative moral code. Both may conflict with your relative code.
If you are an eternal God, a few thousand years of humans practicing relative morality and define evil, is a blink of an eye. The humans are learning the pitfalls of relative morality, the hard way, but will eventually end up finding the natural path back too Eden. If God does it for them, they do not have free will and choice.
Jesus was a sacrifice for sin; forgiveness of sin. This did away with law, since human law is full of relative morality, which keeps evil alive; laws based on political and personal bias.
In ancient times, each culture had its own rules; clique, which did not fully overlap the rules of their neighbors. Relative morality needed to end so the conflict/evil zones, between, could be bridged. The two political parties in America, each have their own relative moral code. The game of politics has gotten out of control, due to the relative evil that is spawned. Humans do not need God to create evil out of thin air. Ironically, those who preach relative morality tend to blame god and not their own code.
