madhatter85
Transhumanist
I'm unaware of any source that indicates that the Apostolic keys were passed to anyone not mentioned in the Bible. I know that the Roman Catholic belief is that Peter was the first Bishop of Rome and that he passed on the keys to Linus, who is regarded as Peter's successor. Of course, as the Latter-day Saints believe, a Bishop is not the same as an Apostle, and even if Peter were to have ordained Linus to the office of a Bishop, that would not be the same thing as giving him apostolic authority. Besides, I've always found it kind of interesting that Revelation would have been given to John, who was then exiled on the Isle of Patmos. If Linus truly held the authority the Catholic Church believes he had, why wouldn't God have given Him the revelation He gave John. It just seems very odd that He would have bypassed the head of the Church.[/color]
When I used the phrase "Priesthood authority," I was thinking specifically of the keys of the apostleship. I know that none of our leaders have ever mentioned a specific date at which the Great Apostasy was complete. If all priesthood authority was gone with the death of the last Apostle, it would be relatively easy to pinpoint the date. Since people undoubtedly did hold the priesthood for a period of time after the Apostles deaths, the keys of the offices that were filled would have still been active. Of course, we know that the keys held by the Apostles themselves would have been necessary in order for the Church to function as Christ had intended it to.
very well put.
I would add that seeing certain things done in the Catholic Church, I believe at one point they did hold the Aaronic priesthood. Thier highest position in the church at the time of it's organization was "Bishop" and we know through revelation that the office of Bishop is an Aaronic Priesthood calling. The word "Pope" is derived from a Latin abbreviation, PAPA, meaning "Father of Fathers" or "Bishop of Bishops." The Pope was then elected by a vote and placed into that position. Also the Church places a very big emphasis on communion or the sacrament, and thier recruiting of young men to take part in thier weekly rites.
To me, it sounds like they really tried to follow Christ's example and did the best that they could with the resources they had, and as time went on, things were lost, mistranslated, misunderstood, re-scribed, ect...
I don't think the "Great Apostasy" is something we can narrow down to a certain date on a calendar, but rather somethign that transpired over a very long period of time.