Victor said:
Fair enough. My only point is that it SHOULDN'T be seen as odd when I just gave you an example of God working in a such a manner. As long as I can get "God wouldn't do that" out of your mind. I'm a satisfied customer... Baby steps...
Perhaps I was coming across as a different mindset. I don't and have never professed that "God wouldn't do that" to Mary. There was another earlier who did say that, though. God will do or will allow all sorts of things to happen, and I cited several examples ranging from the biblical flood to the martyrdom of the apostles earlier.
I have no problem with the possibility that God may have given Mary the direction of perpetual virginity. I would just like to see evidence of that somewhere in the scriptures.
In this and other discussion, I have reached the following conclusion(s):
- The perpetual virginity of Mary is important to some people, not important to others, and is of no significance to a person's spirituality or walk with God.
- The scriptures do not provide evidence that Mary was perpetually virgin nor do they provide evidence that she was. Her relationship with Joseph following the birth of the Savior is not described and cannot be surmised using scripture alone. This also defines the significance of the possibility from a spiritual perspective.
- The scriptures do not provide explicit definition that Jesus had siblings that were children of Mary. Yet again, the scriptures also do not provide explicit definition that Jesus did not have siblings that were children of Mary. Only inference can be made. Whether that inference is made by amateur debaters on an Internet forum or doctorites of Theology, it's still an inference and an educated guess, at best.
- The things that are important to our walk of faith are quite clear. Jesus set forth instructions that, regardless of translation, determine our salvation. These are the acceptance of Jesus as Messiah, the recognition of death by crucifixion, and the belief in the physical resurrection of the body of Christ.