MaddLlama said:
Why do you think that spirits and ghosts have more compelling evidence than Bigfoot? Plenty of people believe in bigfoot, and they think there's plenty of proof that he exists. I see this as no different from believing in ghosts, spirits, or God. They are all supernatural things which have no real evidence as to thier existance. Just because some people believe in them doesn't make them true.
People have believed in bigfoot for hundreds of years - ever hear of the Chupacabra? Same thing. So, because he is an old Mexican belief, does that mean it's real?
Just guessing, but your an Athiest, yes?:sarcastic
1)Belief in ghosts and spirits has existed in every culture almost since the dawn of man. That alone suggest
something.
2)Bigfoot is an urban legend, and the best "evidence" for him was actually a guy in a suit.
3)The Chupacabra is nothing like Bigfoot. The thing is said to be a vampire that comes at night and kills livestock. I've never heard of Bigfoot doing
that. Also, the Bigfoot myth was not started by Mexicans and is not hundreds of years old.
4)I'm gonna ignore that you said theres no God. We'll start with the small stuff.
5)Is there anything you've ever witnessed that you can't rationally explian?