Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Would that mean He is both wise and stupid, kind and cruel, honest and dishonest?SnaleSpace said:I'm not Christian but I studied the bible for 15 years of my life. and I believe that God has form/no form and is basically an entity that cannot be described other than to say every aspect of him is "quantum" i.e. on/off hot/cold sweet/sour at the same time.
He created all those personality traits so he must understand them. He simply chooses to employ them uh... never .Katzpur said:Would that mean He is both wise and stupid, kind and cruel, honest and dishonest?
Nm man, if Katz doesn't mind neither do I.Aqualung said:oops. I accidentally posted in here without seeing it was a one on one debate. Sorry
well, she'll be saying what I'm thinking, but much more eloquently and understandably, so why bother.SnaleSpace said:Nm man, if Katz doesn't mind neither do I.
So we are created in the image of God's emotions, that when He said, "Let us make man in ourimage, after our likeness," He was speaking of His emotions? Do you believe that when Adam "begat a son in his own likeness, after hisimage," it was referring to Adam's emotions, too? Or do you believe that in this instance, it was saying that Adam had a son who was, like him, in human form?SnaleSpace said:I believe something that has unlimited power, knowledge and understanding must be beyond our limited descriptive ability. I believe that when he stated he made us in his image, he was referring to two things:
- Emotions. On different occassions in the bible it is recorded that God loves us, he shows others compassion and, on occassion, is brought to anger.
I see. This actually sounds very much the the Trinity most denominations know. How is it different?- I believe that God is 1 being with 3 integrated parts. (yes the trinity, but not as most denominations know it) Like us in the fact that we are Body (jesus) Mind (Yahweh/God) and Spirit (uhhh... Holy Spirit ).
So the Father is the Son and the Son is the Holy Ghost and the Holy Ghost is the Father?With reference to the latter point, he is one entity but three at the same time.
I'm sorry, but I'm just really dense when it comes to metaphysics. You'll have to help me out. Could you give me some references from the Bible that describe God as formless and indescribable? I believe that neither Moses nor Jacob would have described Him as formless. What do you think Moses meant when He said He spoke to God "face to face, as a man speaketh to a friend"?Situations like this within religion are why I use quantum. There's simply no other way to explain than indescribable or formless, and I think they lack the pointedness of God being more than one thing at once. And that's not necessarily only two things either.
Who cares? I gave up on having a one-on-one debate a long time ago. (Your avatar kind of scares me, though! )SnaleSpace said:Nm man, if Katz doesn't mind neither do I.
It scared me, too!Katzpur said:Who cares? I gave up on having a one-on-one debate a long time ago. (Your avatar kind of scares me, though! )
I see what you're saying. To clarify: God created our emotions in the likeness of his emotions, we just don't have the capacity to control them to the point where we can manifest all of this complex set of feelings at the same time. I think the Bible was referring to the way a son is similar to his father in personality and physical likeness. I find it difficult to apply this to God and man as when we die, the physical is left behind as we go to join God with our spirits. As to our minds I have no idea. I would suggest (and it is only a suggestion) that they are simply a tool God gave us to reason, so that we can find him, and through him salvation.Katzpur said:So we are created in the image of God's emotions, that when He said, "Let us make man in ourimage, after our likeness," He was speaking of His emotions? Do you believe that when Adam "begat a son in his own likeness, after hisimage," it was referring to Adam's emotions, too? Or do you believe that in this instance, it was saying that Adam had a son who was, like him, in human form?
Difficult to answer. I try to think of them all as the same being representing itself in different ways, with each different way of representation also having it's own existence within the original being. Maybe one day I'll photoshop an image to describe what I see in my head but to be honest, words just fail me in this area at present.I see. This actually sounds very much the the Trinity most denominations know. How is it different?
I tend to see it more as they are all God acting in different ways, each part with it's own purpose. The spirit directs the mind, which directs the body, while the body provides a place for the spirit to exist in the physical world while providing sustenance (oxygen/energy) to the brain, enabling it to function.So the Father is the Son and the Son is the Holy Ghost and the Holy Ghost is the Father?
I'll start with Moses; I think you are referring to when he reached the mountain top at Sinai? It's impossible to know how God manifested himself to Moses on the mountain top, or whether he simply was not there but either manifested in Moses mind, or took Moses spirit away to let him understand what God wanted for his people in Canaan. I prefer to think of the "Burning Bush" though, where when Moses questioned God as to who he is, God simply stated "I am".I'm sorry, but I'm just really dense when it comes to metaphysics. You'll have to help me out. Could you give me some references from the Bible that describe God as formless and indescribable? I believe that neither Moses nor Jacob would have described Him as formless. What do you think Moses meant when He said He spoke to God "face to face, as a man speaketh to a friend"?
Kathryn
Hahaha yeah scared me first time I saw it. It's the cover of an album by a band called King Crimson (their debut from 1969 Court of the Crimson King). Messed up prog rockers.Katzpur said:Who cares? I gave up on having a one-on-one debate a long time ago. (Your avatar kind of scares me, though! )
Are you saying we're just little peices of god that are living here for a bit, and then when we die we'll go back to god and not be little fragments anymore?snalespace said:find it difficult to apply this to God and man as when we die, the physical is left behind as we go to join God with our spirits. As to our minds I have no idea. I would suggest (and it is only a suggestion) that they are simply a tool God gave us to reason, so that we can find him, and through him salvation.
I wonder... Can you think of one single solitary instance of how you might use the word "image" in a sentence and not be speaking of physical appearance? I've tried and tried to come up with one and can't. That's just one reason why I believe that the word "image," as it is used in the Bible means exactly what it means the rest of the time. The Bible also says that Jesus was "the express image of [His Father's] person." Obviously, Jesus had a physical body. How could He be the express image of His Father's person if His father had no form?SnaleSpace said:I see what you're saying. To clarify: God created our emotions in the likeness of his emotions, we just don't have the capacity to control them to the point where we can manifest all of this complex set of feelings at the same time. I think the Bible was referring to the way a son is similar to his father in personality and physical likeness. I find it difficult to apply this to God and man as when we die, the physical is left behind as we go to join God with our spirits. As to our minds I have no idea. I would suggest (and it is only a suggestion) that they are simply a tool God gave us to reason, so that we can find him, and through him salvation.
Difficult to answer. I try to think of them all as the same being representing itself in different ways, with each different way of representation also having it's own existence within the original being. Maybe one day I'll photoshop an image to describe what I see in my head but to be honest, words just fail me in this area at present.
I tend to see it more as they are all God acting in different ways, each part with it's own purpose. The spirit directs the mind, which directs the body, while the body provides a place for the spirit to exist in the physical world while providing sustenance (oxygen/energy) to the brain, enabling it to function.
Well, since I really didn't intend that this thread be another one on the Trinity, I don't think I'll pursue it at this point.I suppose it's impossible to know if you simply disregard what the Bible says. But I have a difficult time doing that. It says Moses talked to God face to face. I see no logical reason to think that that wasn't exactly what happened.I'll start with Moses; I think you are referring to when he reached the mountain top at Sinai? It's impossible to know how God manifested himself to Moses on the mountain top, or whether he simply was not there but either manifested in Moses mind, or took Moses spirit away to let him understand what God wanted for his people in Canaan. I prefer to think of the "Burning Bush" though, where when Moses questioned God as to who he is, God simply stated "I am".
Kathryn
P.S. Is your avatar your own artwork?
I believe that when Jesus says he is in his fathers Image he is a representation of God's thoughts and abilities here on Earth.Katzpur said:I wonder... Can you think of one single solitary instance of how you might use the word "image" in a sentence and not be speaking of physical appearance? I've tried and tried to come up with one and can't. That's just one reason why I believe that the word "image," as it is used in the Bible means exactly what it means the rest of the time. The Bible also says that Jesus was "the express image of [His Father's] person." Obviously, Jesus had a physical body. How could He be the express image of His Father's person if His father had no form?
I can't argue with you there, being raised as a Christian (Church of Christ I don't know what you call it in the states, might be the same), I understand that the Bible is the word of God and should be taken as is. Perhaps God chose to represent himself as something that Moses would understand to put him at ease and enable better communications.I suppose it's impossible to know if you simply disregard what the Bible says. But I have a difficult time doing that. It says Moses talked to God face to face. I see no logical reason to think that that wasn't exactly what happened.
Good lord no. I WISH!!! I only have pretensions to artistic ability.Kathryn
P.S. Is your avatar your own artwork?
Oh well! Duh! Ask me if I'm stupid. Never mind. Just ask me if I'm old.Aqualung said: