MikeDwight
Well-Known Member
If you offer a service to customers online, who agree to it online. Would that be an agreement that is honest? Otherwise, disclaim any sort of online contact and agreement and meaning?
Has anyone watched Judge Judy and there are tons of "Gentleman's Agreements". That just requires both parties admitting to it. It occurs when any two persons shake hands or other acknowledgments over a contracted agreement, to the same service.
Many in Business claim you cannot legally pursue contracts, say, a person's 1st language is Spanish, you claim they "understood" a contract in English, then it likely won't hold up in court for your business that the signature is sincere.
Where exactly does this end concerning those with a 1st language that isn't English? Where do we have clear rules in the Cosmopolitan society?
Where is the very philosophy and nature of Agreement? It seems like people are turning everything upside down into absolute disaster. We can't really have 1% efficacy in the face of 100% hostile communicated disservice between the interest groups in our communities.
Many countries around the world do not believe in contracted agreement, they believe in the evolutions of ongoing relationships.
Many cultures of Americans today will not like the honest society, where they may be from societies that deal with problems differently and treat status between persons differently.
Violation of Contract isn't necessarily when a customer prank calls the pizza to be delivered in the United States. Is it? Maybe it is. If they record a phone call? Violation of Contract should be the transaction is refused that was agreed to.
Parties cannot be ordered to Perform in court, only to make whole the other party, by which individual contracts can be broken anyway.
Many countries around the world do in fact have lower values to honesty/truth and higher corruption statistically, and its one of many evils to worry about.
Do religious institutions help this setting? Would cemented agreement on an altar mean to society agreement in this day and age? Otherwise what of the lawcourts is helping with the international state of honesty and agreement?
Are people allowed to break contract with you from any later show of disrespect of the person?
I have asked a LOT of questions. I want to provide something philosophically to the forum, of course.
I want a thread that's engaging. If every time you and your surroundings enter any sort of agreement, groceries, a fastfood store, insurance, prescriptions, what if they could detain you on suspicion, have all those other business contacts ordered for you not to be on their property, and charge yourself with investigation and credentials. That's not necessarily illegal or cruel or impossible. its abuses that we tried to break up monopolies to give any choice to free agency, we try to have speedy trials with Habeus Corpus that punishment is linked slightly with wrongdoing.
The more society is a collection of self-promoting memes, behaviors, nuances, and social systems, then the more we will face the problem of agreement. Parties Will go their entire lives in constant contact without the smallest agreement on the largest matters ever happening their entire lives. We promote images of the ideal immigrant that has been totally battered and abused into an American TV-worthy stereotype as if the legal or business discussion will be only with that character.
Has anyone watched Judge Judy and there are tons of "Gentleman's Agreements". That just requires both parties admitting to it. It occurs when any two persons shake hands or other acknowledgments over a contracted agreement, to the same service.
Many in Business claim you cannot legally pursue contracts, say, a person's 1st language is Spanish, you claim they "understood" a contract in English, then it likely won't hold up in court for your business that the signature is sincere.
Where exactly does this end concerning those with a 1st language that isn't English? Where do we have clear rules in the Cosmopolitan society?
Where is the very philosophy and nature of Agreement? It seems like people are turning everything upside down into absolute disaster. We can't really have 1% efficacy in the face of 100% hostile communicated disservice between the interest groups in our communities.
Many countries around the world do not believe in contracted agreement, they believe in the evolutions of ongoing relationships.
Many cultures of Americans today will not like the honest society, where they may be from societies that deal with problems differently and treat status between persons differently.
Violation of Contract isn't necessarily when a customer prank calls the pizza to be delivered in the United States. Is it? Maybe it is. If they record a phone call? Violation of Contract should be the transaction is refused that was agreed to.
Parties cannot be ordered to Perform in court, only to make whole the other party, by which individual contracts can be broken anyway.
Many countries around the world do in fact have lower values to honesty/truth and higher corruption statistically, and its one of many evils to worry about.
Do religious institutions help this setting? Would cemented agreement on an altar mean to society agreement in this day and age? Otherwise what of the lawcourts is helping with the international state of honesty and agreement?
Are people allowed to break contract with you from any later show of disrespect of the person?
I have asked a LOT of questions. I want to provide something philosophically to the forum, of course.
I want a thread that's engaging. If every time you and your surroundings enter any sort of agreement, groceries, a fastfood store, insurance, prescriptions, what if they could detain you on suspicion, have all those other business contacts ordered for you not to be on their property, and charge yourself with investigation and credentials. That's not necessarily illegal or cruel or impossible. its abuses that we tried to break up monopolies to give any choice to free agency, we try to have speedy trials with Habeus Corpus that punishment is linked slightly with wrongdoing.
The more society is a collection of self-promoting memes, behaviors, nuances, and social systems, then the more we will face the problem of agreement. Parties Will go their entire lives in constant contact without the smallest agreement on the largest matters ever happening their entire lives. We promote images of the ideal immigrant that has been totally battered and abused into an American TV-worthy stereotype as if the legal or business discussion will be only with that character.
Last edited: