Etritonakin
Well-Known Member
God cannot actually exempt himself from MOST BASIC LAW.So if there were a God who exempts himself from the very laws of nature in which he/she/it/they would have created, then there'd be no telling by us humans what this supernatural being could be like. In other words, there'd be no way for us to figure out this God's nature . Hence, such a God would be utterly senseless and meaningless.
Consider.... An "eternal" God -whether developing or always having existed in a complex, aware state -could not possibly have decided upon his own MOST BASIC nature -or the fact that such a God existed in the first place.
God would essentially be composed of most basic substance and would exist according to most basic law. Such would be the attributes OF GOD (I AM THAT AM).
God -having eventually created all OTHER things (though having some creative input in regard to himself as able) by arranging most basic substance according to most basic law -which governs the ensuing math, logic, etc. -is in a position to interface with all things from/on that level -whereas we must interface with things from/on our own level.
We, as individuals, represent a small portion of the sum of all things -whereas God is the sum. We, as individuals, must act on the environment from within the environment in a fashion limited by our design and composition -whereas all things are essentially "within" God -ARE God -and can be accessed by God. He is also in a position to rearrange any NEW laws created from most basic law. Actually, we do similarly, but on a more simple scale -and from our limited position/perspective.