Keep in mind that Luke is talking about the Jewish Passover.
What other passover is there?
The Jewish leaders would never try to get rid of a Jew who had come to confirm God's Law to the People. Thus, contradiction.
They would if he called them hypocrites (Matthew 23:13-31) Also at Matthew 23:1-4 he describes how they say "do as i say not as I do"when they should be practicing what they preach. Also he says that they load people with heavy burdens but dont then also load themselves with burdens.
He was speaking against them, because they were doing the wrong thing, thus they would want to get rid of him. To Kill him, because he was against them not with them.
Therefore NOT a contradiction.
I think you were missing the point of both those scriptures. Satan was trying to Kill jesus right from the time that the star was put above him so the "Wise men" or Astrologers as they actualy are, were able to follow and lead Herod who wanted Jesus dead to Jesus to kill him.Interesting that in Judas, Satan wuld rush Jesus to the cross. In Peter, he would try to prevent Jesus' death. Thus, contradiction.
Also please quote the scriptures you are refering to, in regards to Peter saving Jesus'life.
It was not a contradiction because if it is the case I think you are referring to, yet another test from Satan, in a long line of tests from Satan.
Thus again NOT contradiction.
Judas had not asked for money. The Jews would not volunteer money when they could get something for free. Contradiction.
That is a direct bible scripture. Read a little more carefully and you will find other scriptures that bacvk up the claim that judas was out for money.
like John 12:4-6 for example.
Thus again NOT contradiction
Here, Jesus is being framed by the Pauline mind of the gospel writers to take responsibility for the Pauline policy of Replacement Theology by celebrating the Passover on the 13th of Nisan, when it was impossible in Judaism before the 14th.
Show me the scripture that says that please.
For he was Gods PERFECT son. He stayed that way until death, therefore he would have been doing what Jehovah wanted to the LETTER as he was there in heaven when the law was created.
The gospel writers wrote what they saw and heard, not some strange version, but what was said and done by Christ.
It is not some weird thing tht the passover was "missed"or "changed"it is what Jehovah wanted, because after htis passover the Jews were no longer Gods Chosen people, it was spiritual israel not physical israel who inherits what Jehovah promised. Also At this passover is when the new covenant was created, this is the moment hte heavely hope was created for mankind. And only for 144000 of them the rest have the hope of everlastingl ife on a paradise earth.
Can be fabricated if Jesus was there. Remember the bible is Gods inspired word, not that of mans but what God wants us to know, therefore not fabricated by man, unless it is fabricated through later translations which it is not.Keep in mind that this is no longer the Jewish Passover but the one fabricated by the gospel writers. Replacement Theology.
The Pauline policy of Replacement Theology hit the target. Jesus has been framed. Now, Passover would no longer remind freedom from Egypt but Jesus' New Covenant from his blood.
Framed for what? for doing what he was expected by Jehovah to do? The passover just as the sacrifices to Jehovah were a foreshadowing of what Christ was to do for ALL mankind, not just a certain group of mankind.
Now, you are read to read my thread, "Replacement Theology." And now, because this is the only relilgious thing "Jehovah's Witnesses" do, is the punch line for the joke. What does it mean to a Jew. Have you forgotten, you are answering my thread?
The apostle Paul, in urging Christians to live clean lives, attributes pictorial significance to the Passover. He says: For, indeed, Christ our passover has been sacrificed. (1Co 5:7) Here he likens Christ Jesus to the Passover lamb. John the Baptizer pointed to Jesus, saying: See, the Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world! (Joh 1:29) John may have had in mind the Passover lamb, or he could have been thinking of the male sheep that Abraham offered up instead of his own son Isaac or of the male lamb that was offered up upon Gods altar at Jerusalem each morning and evening.Ge 22:13; Ex 29:38-42.
Certain features of the Passover observance were fulfilled by Jesus. One fulfillment lies in the fact that the blood on the houses in Egypt delivered the firstborn from destruction at the hands of the destroying angel. Paul speaks of anointed Christians as the congregation of the firstborn (Heb 12:23), and of Christ as their deliverer through his blood. (1Th 1:10; Eph 1:7) No bones were to be broken in the Passover lamb. It had been prophesied that none of Jesus bones would be broken, and this was fulfilled at his death. (Ps 34:20; Joh 19:36) Thus the Passover kept by the Jews for centuries was one of those things in which the Law provided a shadow of the things to come and pointed to Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God.Heb 10:1; Joh 1:29.