Look, in this basic experiment t the conductors put different types of liquid and used color dye to differentiate between the different liquids:
Voided right there.
Different liquids.
Its like saying 'Water can have a surface pressure next to oil'
Which is obvious and uninteresting because water and oil
cannot mix.
Water can mix with water however.
Also, the two seas are not on top of each other are they?
They are
next to each other. Notice how you are unable to respond to the basic physical impossibility of surface tension stopping mixing
This primarily occurs because of density (so it is relevant) .
Nope. Its still irrelevant.
The two things which have the greatest effect on density are temperature and particle concentration.
Temperature can be thrown out because they must have similar temperatures.
It’s obvious that density, salinity, and temperature are all interconnected.
Nope.
Salinity and temperature are independent.
Density has no effect on either salinity or temperature.
Because density must be a function of salinity, density is irrelevant.
And btw currents exist in oceans
And seas. I take it you have never been boating.
The
currents in the Mediterranean are well documented.
Nordic seas= of turbulent nature
So this causes the Nordic seas to mix
Not all seas are turbulent, so this is an exception
How many would you like me to cite?
I can show you current tables for almost any sea out there.
The north sea, the Gulf of Mexico, the Baltic sea.
Seas which do not mix with other sources of water seem to the exception.
Lol. This is why you must provide citation when you make an argument. I cannot battle ignorance. Ions are irrelevant to this discussion:
Take a basic chem class before spewing this nonsense.
If you are in one, pay attention at least. Have you never balanced a pin on the surface of a water, then dropped soap in to cause the pin to drop?
In 2004, scientists tackled the question of where ions—charged particles such as chloride from the salt sodium chloride (Cl - of NaCl), for example—go in a body of water. Conventional wisdom says the surface layers of water repel ions, which are abundant in salty seawater.
Source: Ions at the Edge
The Chemistry of Water: Making a Splash >> Ions and interactions
This only proves your ignorance and feeble understanding of chemistry; you are making a fool of yourself. Once again, I extend my citation from the beginning of my post:
:areyoucra
I see you cherrypicked your quote
Here is the entire thing, bolded for your convenience.
In 2004, scientists tackled the question of where ions—charged particles such as chloride from the salt sodium chloride (Cl - of NaCl), for example—go in a body of water. Conventional wisdom says the surface layers of water repel ions, which are abundant in salty seawater. Consequently, scientists thought such molecules might get buried, going deep into the interior of solutions. But new experimental and computer-generated models from several different research teams indicate the current thinking is wrong. Although they disagree on some of the details, everyone involved concludes that at least some ions are present in the surface layers of water particles. And where there are accumulated ions, chemistry can occur.
In fact, exposed ions on the ocean surface and in aerosols could potentially bind and react with all sorts of chemicals from the atmosphere. Consequently, fog and ocean spray droplets may be more chemically reactive than previously thought. Indeed, recent atmospheric research indicates that is the case. For example, reports suggest that two ions found in seawater—bromide and chloride—trigger chemical reactions that destroy ozone in the Arctic atmosphere. These destructive but natural events occur after wind and waves deposit the chemicals on polar ice and expose them to sunlight. If the 2004 results hold up, atmospheric chemists who have long ignored the contributions of surface ions when modeling conditions such as air quality will have to rethink their calculations.
Stop grasping.
