Better to say: if miracles don't exist there wouldn't be creatures with free will
Both questions represent an anecdotal subjective questions, without answers,.and are not viable premises for valid logical arguement.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Better to say: if miracles don't exist there wouldn't be creatures with free will
well.....I have heard an expression that sounded like....All our actions are conditioned or they are by randomness/probability. There is no free-will, though we feel we have it.
Why? Some power was dictating it? He certainly did not prove it convincingly. So many people disbelieve.
No, in this context with God I mean any metaphysical reality, it could be the Christian god, the Muslim god, Einstein’s God, or “Mystical new age energy”By "God," do you mean the Christian God?
does that God have a mind and emotional heart?No, in this context with God I mean any metaphysical reality, it could be the Christian god, the Muslim god, Einstein’s God, or “Mystical new age energy”
The whole thing seems like kind of a mess, frankly.Premise 1 if God doesn't exist there wouldn't be creatures with free will
Premise 2 there are creatures with free will
Therefore God exists
So if you are an Atheist, agnostic, non theist etc. Which premise would you deny 1 or 2?
How is that sort of "free will" different from just "will?"*with free will I simply mean "the hability to descide" for example desciding between eating a healthy salad or a hamburger would be an example of free will.
I do not believe in anything which cannot be objectively defined, and science can investigate these things. I differ with you. One must have control over his/her words and must know the subject clearly. Don't we now understand relativity and some of Quantum Mechanics?No, you can't really define subjectivity in objective terms, so that science can study it.
and did someone twist your armI differ with you.
I do not believe in anything which cannot be objectively defined, and science can investigate these things. I differ with you. One must have control over his/her words and must know the subject clearly. Don't we now understand relativity and some of Quantum Mechanics?
The energy concept belongs to Physics, not to metaphysics.Mystical new age energy
The energy concept belongs to Physics, not to metaphysics.
I don’t know, you can call it will, free will or give it an other name, I already defined what I mean, feel free to label that definition however you want.How is that sort of "free will" different from just "will?"
I tried to explain why we sometimes fail to mention the problem clearly and correctly. Confusion leads to questions like in this OP. What is it that cannot be checked with science?and did someone twist your arm and force that denial?
Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Anthropology, Paleontology, we have put these artificial barriers. Basically the whole of it is just knowledge, science. Even the existence of God and his messengers (prophets / sons / manifestations / mahdis) should be checked with science. People do not do it, because it hurts their cultural and religious beliefs.But physics is not everything.
The energy is defined as what the Energy-meter is measuring. The time - the clock measures.But physics is not everything.
There is no "free will", but the word freewill.I don’t know, you can call it will, free will or give it an other name, I already defined what I mean, feel free to label that definition however you want.
Premise 1 if God doesn't exist there wouldn't be creatures with free will
Premise 2 there are creatures with free will
Therefore God exists
So if you are an Atheist, agnostic, non theist etc. Which premise would you deny 1 or 2?
*with free will I simply mean "the hability to descide" for example desciding between eating a healthy salad or a hamburger would be an example of free will.
people like @shunyadragon and @Polymath257 made a similar pointI would attack both premises. So, let's start with the first.
Let us assume that creatures with free will (whose definition and scope we assume known) exist,
how do you infer from that fact that God exists?
Ciao
- viole
your dreamsWhat is it that cannot be checked with science?
Actually, free will can't exist if a god that knows the future exists. Free will is only possible in an godless universe.
I guess science decides that it is all in your mind !