Be specific based on the evidence that you have seen, which of these claims do you think is more likely wrong than correct.
You're the one asking me to accept them as correct.
Upto you to support these points with evidence.
Don't shift the burden of proof.
Nobody is claiming that these are establish 100% certain facts, all I am saying is that based on the evidence that we have to date these claims are more likely to be true than false
No you claimed that scholars and historians accept these points as correct / very likely correct by consensus.
I reject that claim.
………………..if you disagree then please tell me which specific claims do you think are more likely false and why
They are your claims. Don't shift the burden of proof.
You claimed the majority of historians accept these points. You have not provided evidence for that, for example.
As for your 5 points, you have no provided evidence for any of them either.
All you have are bare claims and declarations.
Don't ask me to "disprove" them if you can't even be bothered to properly support them yourself, or at least attempt to.
To quote The Hitch:
what is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.