I just posted this in a reply, but I am afraid it will be buried without response in a DIR.
When I belonged to a new believer's (interdenominational Christian) discipleship group back in 1991, I had posed the question of feminism to the leader, who told me a few memorable things:
1. God created man AND woman in "his" image; in other words, it takes both genders to reflect God.
2. Descriptions of the Holy Spirit allude to the divine feminine: the dove, the hovering over the waters of creation like a hen incubating eggs, the "Shekinah" (presence of God) being a feminine form in the Hebrew.
3. El Shadai, an early name of God in Genesis has been translated as "Mountain Dwelling" as well as "Breasted One."
Any additions or objections?
I think its great to clarify whenever possible that gender does not affect our value as people, but I think its not useful to attempt to give a gender to justice, to love or to righteousness. These things are spiritual. This is one of the reasons I think its a mistake to equate Jesus with God in public prayers or to equate the Father with God in public prayers, and I hear people do this all the time. I think it confuses people. If we pray to the Father in Heaven, what we are doing is claiming to be heirs with Christ. The two things are one and the same and do not change the nature of God nor make God a male. I think in public prayers people should make it clear so as not to confuse that they are claiming to be heirs as peacemakers, that they are not viewing God as a male. In reality they are taking maleness away from God, removing that idea which was from the pagans who assigned gender to the gods. God is spirit. Christians claim to be heirs in Christ, and there are not males or females in Christ. In ancient times inheritance came through fathers, and that I suggest is why the term Father and not Mother was used.
To me feminism should mean that young women are taught to educate themselves and to see themselves as co-preservers of culture and knowledge, because they are. Every free person, particularly every free woman, is only free because they had mothers and grandmothers who worked for it. Its up to women to continue to value education, even though it competes with family. Its easy for them to think "Hey all I am going to be very busy raising a family, so I don't need a high school education. I don't need to learn a foreign language...etc" Its also easy for men to express the opinion that daughters are needed for work and for rearing children and shouldn't be spared for education. Maybe it doesn't look like it today, but its easy for the world to go to hell very quickly when nobody is actively educating girls.
I do not think feminism needs to enforce particular choices. It just needs to enable women to know about them. I don't think its wrong to expect men to hold a door. That is a woman's choice. I don't think its wrong for a woman to want to spend her life rearing children and being married.
The way I see it Christians are not Jews, however Christians ought to pick up on how things have always worked. The man is responsible to make sure all of the children are educated. He is the peacemaker in the home, so it falls to him. Nevertheless women have to do their part, and sometimes they will have to fill in. Somebody has to keep the fire going.
There is no creation, no creator. Illusion.