SethZaddik
Active Member
Well that addresses nothing.
Good. You are not worth my words.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well that addresses nothing.
Yes, rightfully. When the Ottoman Empire fell apart, the British were given control of the area.So if you don't mean giving it back to the British, perhaps you mean giving it back to the Ottomans?Yes, Palestine, such a rightfully British land. Lol.
Did they own their homes, the ones they were forcefully removed from by an invading army?
There is no justification for the Israeli invasion and annexation of Palestine.
Very simple concept.
I agree.Good. You are not worth my words.
Yes, I know what all those words mean. But their usage here is unclear.Do you know what invasion means?
Occupation, annexation?
So you're saying Israel was annexed to nothing because the whole thing is one big annexation?That's what Israel is, occupied Palestine. Annexed almost completely.
Can you show me where I made it about Islam? I'll wait.You kind of made it about Islam, I reacted to it.
Let me get this right.
You can say whatever, I can't tell you it's not the topic though you brought it up, but I do it and you can tell me it's not the topic?
Your a damn hypocrite. Salaam.
So a Poe. Got it.Once it was called Palestine, 1966 and before.
Now it's not.
They didn't give it away.
It was stolen.
End of story.
No. The message of the canonical gospels is that Jesus is Israel. All the gospels including the non-canonical gospels work along those same lines. Jesus doesn’t reveal the divine, he is the divine revealed. The gospels do this by implementing a sort of anthropomorphism. They were not meant to replace Jewish scripture. They are a sort of commentary on Jewish scripture. All known gospels are unique in that they do not fall within any known type of literature of that period. Each of the canonical gospels takes the entire Torah and condenses it into a very short story.How about Jesus, what do we have to classify him as at least a Messianic leader?
No. The message of the canonical gospels is that Jesus is Israel. All the gospels including the non-canonical gospels work along those same lines. Jesus doesn’t reveal the divine, he is the divine revealed. The gospels do this by implementing a sort of anthropomorphism. They were not meant to replace Jewish scripture. They are a sort of commentary on Jewish scripture. All known gospels are unique in that they do not fall within any known type of literature of that period. Each of the canonical gospels takes the entire Torah and condenses it into a very short story. Anthropomorphism - Wikipedia
Replacement Theology? Replacing it with what, Judaism? That’s where the Gospels belong, within Judaism.The message that Jesus is Israel is called by definition, Replacement Theology which also by definition is no different from vandalism of Judaism with the things of Christianity. The rest of the post is simply a statement of idolatry. The message of the gospels cannot be identified as a commentary of the Tanach but rather a plagiarism of it. If the dead could be aware of what is going on on the upper part of the earth, Jesus would turn in the grave.
Yes, rightfully. When the Ottoman Empire fell apart, the British were given control of the area.So if you don't mean giving it back to the British, perhaps you mean giving it back to the Ottomans?
Replacement Theology? Replacing it with what, Judaism? That’s where the Gospels belong, within Judaism.
Replacement Theology is the attempt to replace Judaism or the Tanach with Christianity or the NT. Your statement that the Christian gospel belongs with Judaism is an evidence that you are quite unaware of both, the Tanach and the NT. The NT is in tune with Hellenism. If you read Mat. 1:18 you will probably understand the Hellenistic promotion of the Greek myth of the demigod by using a Jew to enhance that promotion.
Wait so the Quran warns us not to trust the Jews, as they've made up lots of false texts; you then quote the false texts to say we're allies?we have our Talmud, Zohar and more literature than you know about or ever will read in your life."
Are you saying the Gospels were not written by Jews? Another question, are you saying the intended readers of the Gospels are not Jews?Replacement Theology is the attempt to replace Judaism or the Tanach with Christianity or the NT. Your statement that the Christian gospel belongs with Judaism is an evidence that you are quite unaware of both, the Tanach and the NT. The NT is in tune with Hellenism. If you read Mat. 1:18 you will probably understand the Hellenistic promotion of the Greek myth of the demigod by using a Jew to enhance that promotion.
I don't know about any of THAT.Wait so the Quran warns us not to trust the Jews, as they've made up lots of false texts; you then quote the false texts to say we're allies?
The prophets indicate the Gentiles will appeal to the Jews, as they've refused God's messengers.
Wait so the Quran warns us not to trust the Jews, as they've made up lots of false texts; you then quote the false texts to say we're allies?
The prophets indicate the Gentiles will appeal to the Jews, as they've refused God's messengers.
Wait so the Quran warns us not to trust the Jews, as they've made up lots of false texts; you then quote the false texts to say we're allies?
The prophets indicate the Gentiles will appeal to the Jews, as they've refused God's messengers.