Shame?
That is for the weak.
We who play board games pick the best move we see,
even if it's imperfect. It would be folly to select a better
move which has the singular failing of unavailability.
(That was a reference to better 3rd party candidates.)
Some people (typically lefties) are blind to the idea that
one can vote for a candidate one doesn't support.
Even analogies fail to evince the concept.
Suppose one is forced to choose:
Have a good finger or toe amputated.
If one picks a toe, is one a supporter
of amputating perfectly good toes?
A practical person picks the lesser
of 2 evils in order to minimize it.
This is not to support evil.
Last edited:
