Prestor John
Well-Known Member
I began making a list of things you should consider before I answered your questions, but that ended up running a little long and I ran out of time for today. So, think of this as like a “prequel” to your answers. Sorry.I'm not looking for exact wording. What have you got?
I think the first thing to cover would be what the Book of Mormon does not claim.
The Book of Mormon does not claim:
1.) That the Jaredites were the first or only people to inhabit the promised land before the arrival of the Lehites.
2.) That the Lehites were the last people to inhabit the promised land.
3.) That neither the Jaredites nor the Lehites came in contact with other people in the promised land.
4.) That the Lamanites were the only people to inhabit the promised land after the destruction of the Nephites.
5.) Where exactly the events of the Book of Mormon took place (i.e “the promised land”).
There are obviously no verses to quote to prove that the Book of Mormon did not mention something.
A FEW THINGS TO CONSIDER ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE IN THE BOOK OF MORMON
The Book of Mormon does offer us some information about other people inhabiting the promised land.
1.) The most compelling hint that the Lehites dwelt with other people is the “allegory of the olive tree” recorded in Jacob 5. The Lord uses this allegory to explain His method of offering salvation to Mankind and blessing all the inhabitants of the Earth by scattering Israel among them. Israel is likened unto a “tame olive tree” while other nations of people are likened unto “wild olive trees”.
In this allegory, the vineyard of the Lord is the world and it is populated by many olive trees. All are wild save the one tame olive tree, however, the tame olive tree is dying. In order to preserve the fruit of the tame olive tree, the Lord of the vineyard takes the most fruitful branches off of the tree and grafts them into some of the wild olive trees. He then takes some branches from the wild olive trees and grafts them into the tame olive tree. He does this with the hope that He can save both the tame olive tree and all the other wild olive trees.
Many times throughout the Book of Mormon the Lehites mention that they are considered a branch broken off from the tree of Israel (1 Nephi 10:12, 14; 15:7, 12-13, 16; 19:24; 2 Nephi 3:5; 9:53;10:1; Jacob 2:25; Alma 26:36).
This allegory only makes sense if the Lehites (as a branch of the tame olive tree) were taken from the tame olive tree (Israel) and grafted into a wild olive tree (another nation) and became a part of that wild olive tree.
Therefore, it is crucial, according to the Plan of Salvation that the Father has for His children, that the scattered branches of Israel become one with the Gentile nations and grow alongside them. This would include the Lehites. They came to the promised land and were “grafted into” another nation and grew with them. There had to have been other people(s) inhabiting the promised land before the Lehites ever arrived. And when they arrived, the Lehites united with these people(s).
2.) When the Lord warned Nephi to flee from his older brothers, Nephi recorded,
“Wherefore, it came to pass that I, Nephi, did take my family, and also Zoram and his family, and Sam, mine elder brother and his family, and Jacob and Joseph, my younger brethren, and also my sisters, and all those who would go with me. And all those who would go with me were those who believed in the warnings and the revelations of God; wherefore, they did hearken unto my words.” (2 Nephi 5:6)
If the Lehites had not been “grafted into” another nation of people, then who besides his immediate and extended family members could have come with Nephi? He specifically mentioned that after he got all his family and friends to follow him that he also got “all those who would go with [him]” to come as well.
Who were these other people besides members of the indigenous population who had been converted and were willing to follow a foreign man they considered to be a prophet of God?
3.) Soon after the Nephites split from the Lamanites Nephi claims that,
“And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of the temple of Solomon save it were not built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land, wherefore, it could not be built like unto Solomon’s temple. But the manner of the construction was like unto the temple of Solomon; and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine.” (2 Nephi 5:16)
Building anything even close to resembling Solomon’s temple would have taken many decades unless Nephi had thousands of workers at his disposal. So, it is obvious that Nephi did not have only a handful of people with him. He had to have had help from many converts from the indigenous people that Nephi and his family had been “grafted” into.
4.) In the same chapter Nephi claims that,
“And it sufficeth me to say that forty years had passed away, and we had already had wars and contentions with our brethren.” (2 Nephi 5:34)
Nephi knew what a “war” was. He had come from the land of Jerusalem and he had the plates of brass which contained the records of the Jews, including their many wars. So, would Nephi really describe some raiding parties of a few men a “war”?
Not only this, but Mormon (the guy abridging these plates) himself had been a war commander for many years, so he would have definitely known what a “war” was.
In order for the Nephites and Lamanites to have had a “war” after only forty years since they left Jerusalem, both groups would have needed to recruit from an indigenous population.
5.) There is the obvious mention of the people of Zarahemla, who was a descendant of Mulek, son of Zedekiah, King of Judah. They had been led by the Lord out of the land of Jerusalem at the time of the city’s destruction and when Zedekiah had been taken captive by the Babylonians. (Omni 1:13-16, Mosiah 25:2, Helaman 6:10)
Even though the Lehites had the prophesy of Isaiah concerning the eventual destruction of Jerusalem (2 Nephi 3:8) and also the visions of both Lehi and Jacob that confirmed that Jerusalem had indeed been destroyed (2 Nephi 1:4, 6:8), the Lord had prepared and sent these Mulekites to be physical witnesses of Jerusalem’s destruction to bear witness of that fact to the Nephites (Helaman 8:21).
Lehi also alluded to the idea that the Lord had and would still lead others out of the land of Jerusalem into the promised land (2 Nephi 1:9). Nephi also, while he and his family were still camped in the valley of Lemuel, spoke about many lost tribes of Israel that had been led away and scattered “upon the isles of the sea” (1 Nephi 22:4), which he later testified included them (2 Nephi 10:20-21).
6.) Another compelling piece of evidence that there were other people inhabiting the promised land is the mention of Sherem, the anti-Christ, who contended with Jacob.
Jacob 7 introduces Sherem as simply a “man” who had come among the people of Nephi. It does not describe him as either a Nephite or as a Lamanite, just a “man” (Jacob 7:1).
Remember that Jacob had been born in the wilderness of the Old World (1 Nephi 18:7) and was among the first generation of those who had migrated to the promised land. The Lehites had separated into the Nephites and Lamanites during Jacob’s lifetime (2 Nephi 5:5-9), so the record would most definitely have described Sherem as being either a Nephite or a Lamanite if he had been either.
Another clue that Sherem was not a Lehite is the fact that the record claims that Sherem “was learned, that he had a perfect knowledge of the language of the people” (Jacob 7:4), if he had been either a Nephite or a Lamanite, why would the record claim that he was “learned” for simply knowing their common language?
Also, when Sherem accused Jacob of leading the Nephites away to blasphemies, he referred to the Nephites very impersonally as “this people” (Jacob 7:7). If he had been a Nephite, would he have spoken of them in that way?
To me it is obvious that Sherem was an outsider who had come among the Nephites and had been taught in their language and their religion. After he had attained a proper grasp of the language and of their religion he had become “learned” and he began to teach his false doctrine.
Sherem could possibly have been a Jaredite. The Book of Ether claims that during a time of wickedness among the Jaredites the Lord caused a severe drought which killed many people. Some of them escaped to the lands southward, which the record claims was the land of Zarahemla (Ether 9:31-32). It is unclear when this event occurred. It could have happened before either the Lehites or the Mulekites had arrived to the promised land. The record points out that not many Jaredites were able to flee southward due to many poisonous serpents that the Lord had placed to “hedge up the way that the people could not pass” (Ether 9:33).
7.) Something Mormon said is very convincing of the fact that the Nephites were living amongst other nations of people,
“But the Lord knoweth the things which we have written, and also that none other people knoweth our language; and because that none other people knoweth our language, therefore he hath prepared means for the interpretation thereof.” (Mormon 9:34)
If Mormon had been writing this amidst a Nephite-only nation, how could he claim that no one else knew his language? How could Mormon know that other people would not know his language unless he lived among people who spoke another language?
We do know that Pre-Columbian America was ethnically and linguistically diverse. Is Mormon’s comment about no one else knowing his language evidence that he lived among nations of varying languages?
8.) In conjunction to the last point, Mormon’s son, Moroni, in chapter ten of his book near the end of the Book of Mormon records the various gifts of the spirit, which included the gift of tongues.
If the Nephites and Lamanites were isolated and did not associate with other people of varying tongues, why would Moroni know about or ever need the gift of tongues?
9.) Lastly, there are various names in the Book of Mormon, some sounding Hebrew, Egyptian and even Greek.
Considering that Nephi claimed that the Lord leads away the righteous to “precious lands” (1 Nephi 17:38) and that Lehi claimed that the land of promise was a “precious land” (2 Nephi 1:10), could this be evidence that the promise land was a melting pot of immigrants from various nations?