The Big Bang and Evolution

[Ubon]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

 

[Neo Deist]

Welcome to deism.

 

[George-ananda]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

I think you are on the right track.

 

[Ubon]

I feel a God with supreme intelligence would judge a man by his individual actions and not his Religious affiliation.

If not he would be a bit foolish to take a less moral person over a moral one based on their beliefs.

Even a moral Athiest should enter heaven

 

[wicketkeeper]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

Whatever created everything is indeed guilty of everything !

 

[Valjean]

What does the Big Bang have to do with evolution?

 

[Ubon]

What does the Big Bang have to do with evolution?

I said the big bang and evolution in my post.
Seperate things therefore nothing.

 

[Madhuri]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

I've held this opinion for a long time now. It is perfectly compatible with eastern religious beliefs, imo.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

I feel a God with supreme intelligence would judge a man by his individual actions and not his Religious affiliation.

If not he would be a bit foolish to take a less moral person over a moral one based on their beliefs.

Even a moral Athiest should enter heaven

This is precisely what Christ is saying in the parable of the Good Samaritan.
Welcome to True Christianity.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

What does the Big Bang have to do with evolution?

They are both grossly incomplete philosophies full of contradictions and good observations.
They are both wrongly attributed to the category of 'science'; when they are both more than half guess-work;
and rely more on a 'science of the gaps' narrative than on rigorous logic.

Because they both entirely ignore the argument from design, the chaotic nature of their narratives
resembles a process of monkeys randomly typing at keyboards.

 

[jonathan180iq]

Both The Big Bang and Evolutionary Theory have substantiating data and studies supporting them.

What data substantiates the God claim?

 

[metis]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

Actually this is what most Christian theologians believe is likely.

 

[omega2xx]

If God exists perhaps the big bang was his way of creating the universe making scientist and Religion correct.

Maybe he is also responsible for evolution.

You need to read the book He inspired to be written.

Start in chapter 1 of Genesis and figure out what "after their kind" means.

 

[omega2xx]

Both The Big Bang and Evolutionary Theory have substantiating data and studies supporting them.

No they don't.

What data substantiates the God claim?

Matter, energy and life.

 

[metis]

Why is it that some people reject that which has overwhelming evidence to support it and yet blindly believe in that which cannot in any way be objectively substantiated?

 

[Valjean]

No they don't.



Matter, energy and life.

Balderdash!
Intentional ignorance.

 

[Laika]

They are both grossly incomplete philosophies full of contradictions and good observations.
They are both wrongly attributed to the category of 'science'; when they are both more than half guess-work;
and rely more on a 'science of the gaps' narrative than on rigorous logic.

Because they both entirely ignore the argument from design, the chaotic nature of their narratives
resembles a process of monkeys randomly typing at keyboards.

The scientific community will reply to you shortly...

 

[Ubon]

I used the big bang and evolution as two examples as that is what is usually argued between science and Religion.

If either turns out true regardless of what turns out to be true if there is a God it must be from him so why argue at all.

Because of my eg people assume i hold truth to these theories

Idont know how much evidence there is as i dont stud them in depth.

Buddha was asked about creation and refused to answer as its answer is inconceivable to our minds and dwelling on the past will not help you attain nibbana.

 

[omega2xx]

Balderdash!
Intentional ignorance.

What a brilliant response, Chucked full of real scientific evidence. I am sure it convinced everyone you know what you are talking about.

 

[Valjean]

What a brilliant response, Chucked full of real scientific evidence. I am sure it convinced everyone you know what you are talking about.

Was replying in kind to your "No they don't" explanation.